Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am writing up an assignment with includes many identities of Fibonacci numbers. I have made up the following notation (here $f_n$ is the number of tilings of an $n$-board by dominoes and squares - a well known interpretation of Fibonacci numbers):

Given an $n$-board, and some sequence $seq$ of dominos and squares, let $f_n^{seq}$ represent all tilings of an $n$-board that end with the sequence $seq$. So for example $f_n^{DS}$ are all tilings of an $n$-board that end with a domino succeeded by a square. Furthermore, for repeating sequences write: $$ \underbrace{seq,seq, \cdots, seq}_{n-\text{times}} = n\cdot seq $$ So for example $f_n^{SSDSDSDSDS} = f_n^{2S4DS}$. Let the size of a sequence $|seq|$ be the number of tiles the sequence occupies, so $|SS4DS| = 14$. It is clear that: $$ f_n^{seq} = f_{n - |seq|} $$

How may this be improved? Are statements such as

$$ f_{3n-3k} = f_{3n}^{kDS} = f_{3n}^{SSkDS} + f_{3n}^{DkDS} + f_{3n}^{(k+1)DS} = f_{3n-3k}^{SS} + f_{3n-3k}^{D} + f_{3n-3k}^{DS} = $$ $$ = 2f_{3n-3k-2} + f_{3n-3k-3} $$

a bit understandable without explanation? (I do offer an explanation of course).

share|improve this question
What's an n-board? –  Dan Moore Mar 1 '11 at 14:49
An $1\times n$ board to be precise :) –  milcak Mar 1 '11 at 16:32

3 Answers 3

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Putting all that into a superscript (especially with the exponential notation suggested by others) is hard on the eyes. How about:

$f_{3n-3k} = f_{3n}(*(DS)^k) = f_{3n}(*SS(DS)^k) + f_{3n}(*D(DS)^k) + f_{3n}(*(DS)^{k+1})$

etc. Here * represents any sequence (so the argument in parentheses is not the end of the sequence, it's the whole sequence).

share|improve this answer
Agreed. I would even write the left-hand side as $f_{3n-3k}(*)$. –  Greg Graviton Mar 1 '11 at 16:15

I must say that I don't find your $n \cdot seq$ easy to read, and it can appear ambiguous. I'd be inclined to borrow from automata theory and write e.g. $SSDSDSDSDS$ as $S^2(DS)^4$.

I would be inclined to help the lazy reader by also reminding him with the notation that you're talking about the end of sequences, so $\ldots S^2(DS)^4$.

I'm not sure how aesthetic this is when superscripted, but you can see for yourself: $f_{3n}^{\ldots S^2(DS)^4}$

share|improve this answer
Yes that is a bit better. I definitely agree on the $\cdots$, but since usually in the proof I use only at most one repeating sequence, I think $(kDS)$ is ok, otherwise it would get more confusing. Thanks! –  milcak Mar 1 '11 at 11:19
@Milcak: You still get ambiguity when writing $(3DS)$. Does that mean $DDDS$ or $DSDSDS$? –  t.b. Mar 1 '11 at 11:23

Since the topic relates to ordered partitions of n, I would try to dovetail with existing nomenclature for ordered partitions. In particular, I suggest using 2 instead of D and 1 instead of S.

share|improve this answer
This would not be as clear for combinatorial proofs. Dominoes and squares are magic. $1$'s and $2$'s are not (so much). :) –  milcak Mar 1 '11 at 17:29

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.