Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was trying approximate the variance of a ratio of two random variables. I used to approximate it through Taylor's expansion:

Assume $\sqrt{n}\big(X-E(X)\big)=O_p(1)$, $\sqrt{n}\big(Y-E(Y)\big)=O_p(1)$, then


and in the calculation after this the $o_p(1)$ changes into $o(1)$ after taking variance, and can be neglected in the approximation -- At least that's what my lecture notes said.

But today I suddenly had this doubt: why can I just take $Var(o_p(1))$ to be $o(1)$, or even, why can I take $E(o_p(1))=o(1)$? Since p-convergence to zero not necessarily imply variance or expectation also converges to zero, I am no longer sure why I can do the above approximation in that particular way.

Is the approximation I did above correct? If not, what is the correct way to approximate the variance of the ratio?

What are some technical conditions that can guarantee that the above approximation is true?

share|cite|improve this question

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.