Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

(1) I have never studied any projective/affine geometry or algebraic curves. I'd like to see a clear definition of a line in the projective space $\mathbb{P}^n(k)$, since I need it for my algebraic geometry study.

(2) I'm guessing a line is the variety $\mathcal{V}(f_1,\ldots,f_{n-1})$, where $f_i$ are linear homogenous polynomials, whose coefficients form a $n\times n\!-\!1$ matrix of full rank. Yes or no? Another guess would be, that a line in $\mathbb{P}^n(k)$ is uniquely determined by two points $a\!=\![a_0\!:\!\ldots\!:\!a_n]$, $b\!=\![b_0\!:\!\ldots\!:\!b_n]$, such that the matrix $\begin{bmatrix} a \\ b \end{bmatrix}$ is of rank $2$. But how is such a line parametrized? Is any of my two attempts of a definition correct?

(3) What are the defining equations of two intersecting lines in $\mathbb{P}^3$? And now, most importantly: how can I compute the Hilbert polynomial of such a variety?

For such an elementary concept, one would expect it to be the first object defined, but to my annoyance and frustration, I have yet to see an official definition. I have the book Introduction to Algebraic Geometry (Hassett), as well as Algebraic Curves (Fulton) as my main source. Any references would be highly desirable.

thank you

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Regarding the third part of your question: The intersection of two lines in $\mathbb P^3$ is generically empty (if you write down two random lines, they will be skew), but sometimes the lines will be coplanar (i.e. lie in a common plane), and then they will meet in a point (as any two lines in $\mathbb P^2$ do).

If you know that a priori that the two lines meet in a point, then they must be coplanar, and the problem is the same as for two intersecting lines in $\mathbb P^2$.

share|improve this answer
    
How does one know that the problem is the same as for two intersecting lines in $\mathbb{P}^2$? –  Leon Lampret Mar 1 '11 at 16:20
1  
Aha: Hassett p. 214 property 2: the Hilbert polynomial is invariant under projectivities, i.e. $HP_\mathcal{V}=HP_{A(\mathcal{V})}$ for an invertible $(n+1)\times(n+1)$ matrix $A$ over $k$. Right. But how do I calculate $HP$ for two intersecting lines in $\mathbb{P}^2$? –  Leon Lampret Mar 1 '11 at 16:35
1  
@Leon: Dear Leon, What techniques do you know for computing Hilbert polynomials? Regards, –  Matt E Mar 1 '11 at 18:56
    
basically what's in Hassett p. 214: $HP_{\mathcal{V}(f)}(t)=\binom{t+n}{n}-\binom{t-d+n}{n}$ for $f$ homogenous in $n+1$ variables of degree $d$; $HP_S(t)=|S|$ for $S$ finite; $HP_\mathcal{V}$ is invariant under projectivities; $HP_{\mathcal{V}(f,g)}=deg(f)deg(g)$ for $f,g$ homogenous in $2+1$ variables with no common factors; $HP_{\cup_{i=1}^k\mathcal{V}_i}(t)=\sum_{i=1}^k HP_{\mathcal{V}_i}(t)$ for $\mathcal{V}_i$ pairwise disjoint and $k$ alg. closed. –  Leon Lampret Mar 1 '11 at 19:23
2  
@Leon: Then why don't you find a homoogeneous polynomial describing two lines in $\mathbb P^2$ and apply the definition? Regards, –  Matt E Mar 1 '11 at 20:51
show 1 more comment

The line through $(a_0 : ... : a_n)$ and $(b_0 : ... : b_n)$ is uniquely parameterized by $(a_0 X + b_0 Y : a_1 X + b_1 Y : ... a_n X + b_n Y)$. Note that this precisely describes a morphism $\mathbb{P}^1 \to \mathbb{P}^n$ which is an isomorphism onto its image. I am surprised this is not given somewhere in Fulton.

share|improve this answer
    
Hmm, you are right: Fulton section 4, page 48, exercise 4.13. Sorry, I didn't expect it to be in the excercises, and so late in the section. –  Leon Lampret Mar 1 '11 at 2:44
add comment

(2) Your guess is correct, except I think it is an $(n-1)\times (n+1)$ matrix. Think of your line as the intersection of $n-1$ hyperplanes in non-degenerate position.

(3) Assuming you meant the union of two lines $L_1, L_2$, then the defining variety is given by $I_1I_2$.

As for the Hilbert poly., use:

$$0 \to \mathcal O_{L_1\cup L_2} \to \mathcal O_{L_1}\oplus \mathcal O_{L_2} \to \mathcal O_{L_1\cap L_2} \to 0$$

and the fact that Hilbert poly. are additive.

Details added: the two terms on the right of the above sequence can be calculated easily. Think of a line as $Proj(k[x,y])$ and a point (since you know $L_1,L_2$ intersect at a point) as $Proj(k[x])$. I am sure you can find the Hilbert polynomials of those rings.

share|improve this answer
    
(2) yes, of course, $(n-1)\times(n+1)$. –  Leon Lampret Mar 1 '11 at 15:03
1  
(3) Umm, I'm not sure, what you are suggesting. All I know of the Hilbert function and Hilbert polynomial is from Hasset, section 12. Let $L_1, L_2$ be two lines in $\mathbb{P}^3$ with $L_1\cap L_2=\{P\}$. How does one calculate $HP_{L_1\cup L_2=:\mathcal{V}}(t)=HP_{R(\mathcal{V})}(t)=HP_{k[x_0:\ldots:x_3]/I(\mathcal{V})‌​}(t)$? Could you point me to any specific theorem/lemma? Preferrably in Hasset –  Leon Lampret Mar 1 '11 at 16:18
    
@Leon Lampret: I added some details. –  curious Mar 1 '11 at 18:43
    
Hmm, I am not familiar with what you are talking about. Well, since my question has been answered in one way, there is no need to bother and try to explain it to me, but if you do have the patience and a little time, would you care to tell me the exact formulation of this additive property of Hilbert polynomials? Regards, –  Leon Lampret Mar 2 '11 at 18:05
    
@curious: Of course it is obvious for $L_1 \cap L_2$ a point, but why this sequence is exact in the right term in general? –  se0808 Jun 9 at 18:19
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.