$\def\R{\mathrel R}$A relation $R$ is transitive if $a\R b$ and $b\R a$ implies $a\R c$
because it is never $a\R b$ and $b\R a$, it is always true because no matter what $a\R c$ is, if the LHS is false, the statement is always true.
|
$\def\R{\mathrel R}$A relation $R$ is transitive if $a\R b$ and $b\R a$ implies $a\R c$ because it is never $a\R b$ and $b\R a$, it is always true because no matter what $a\R c$ is, if the LHS is false, the statement is always true. |
|||||||
|
|
No. It's easy to prove: you just have to find a counterexample. Take $$a = -9, ~ b = 3, ~ c = -1$$
|
|||||
|
|
No. You have $xRy \iff y = -\frac{1}{3} x$. So $9R(-3)$ and $(-3)R1$ but you do not have $9R1$. |
|||
|
|
|
No. A relation $\R$ is transitive iff $a\R b$ and $b\R c$ imply $a \R c$. For your $R$, suppose $a \R b$ and $b \R c$ hold, then we have $a + 3b = 0$, and $b + 3c = 0$, then $$ a + 3c = -3b + 3c = -4b$$ That is $a\R c$ holds iff $b = 0$. So $\R$ isn't transitive as for example $-3\R 1$ and $1\R -\frac 13$, but $-3 \not\R -\frac 13$. |
||||
|
|