Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $\displaystyle \ \ B(t,T):=\int_t^T f(t,s)ds$, where $f(.,.)$ is a stochastic process whose solution we don't know.

My lecture slides make the claim that:

$$f(t,T) = \frac{\partial B(t,u)}{\partial u} \Bigg|_{u=T}$$

My first question is, what's the notation $\frac{\partial .}{\partial.} \Bigg|_{u=T}$?

My second question is what is this notation?

$$\frac{\partial B(t,T)}{\partial T} \Bigg|_{T\searrow t}$$

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

The first is the value of the derivative in $u=T$ (just substitution).

The second is maybe the limit where $T$ tends monotonously to $t$.

share|improve this answer
    
For the first question, why couldn't he have done $\frac{\partial B(t,T)}{\partial T}$, instead of using $u$ and then substituting in $T$ afterwards? –  Jase Nov 22 '12 at 17:59
    
The short answer is: because $T$ is the function argument, that is, considered constant in the RHS; but you can only differentiate w.r.t. independent variable. For example, put you want $f(t,5)$. The RHS becomes meaningless. –  starteleport Nov 23 '12 at 6:47

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.