Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given that $$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to a} \dfrac{f(x)}{(x - a)^n} = 0$$ Prove that for any given $k, 0 \leq k \leq n$, then $$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to a} \dfrac{f(x)}{(x - a)^k} = 0$$

Here is my current work,

Choose an arbitrary $\epsilon > 0$, choose $\delta = 1$. From hypothesis, we have that if $$|x - a| < \delta \Rightarrow \bigg|\dfrac{f(x)}{(x - a)^n} - 0\bigg| = \bigg|\dfrac{f(x)}{(x - a)^n}\bigg| < \epsilon$$ It follows that if $|x - a| < \delta$, then $$\bigg|\dfrac{f(x)}{(x - a)^k}\bigg| = \bigg|\dfrac{f(x)}{(x - a)^n}\bigg| \cdot |(x - a)^l| < \epsilon \cdot 1^{l} = \epsilon$$

Does this proof make sense? Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated.

In fact, my initial approach is to consider $$\bigg|\dfrac{f(x)}{(x - a)^n}\bigg| \text{ vs. } \bigg|\dfrac{f(x)}{(x - a)^k}\bigg|$$ but I couldn't deduce from that to be less than $\epsilon > 0$ because $k \leq n$, so $|(x - a)^n|$ could be either larger or smaller than $|(x - a)^n|$ depends on $x$ and $a$. (Well actually while writing this question, I've just realized that as long $|x - a| < 1$, it works!).

share|cite|improve this question
But $(x-a)^{l}\to 0$ as $x\to a$. – Hui Yu Nov 22 '12 at 8:50
You need to make sure that $|x-a|$ is actually less than $1$. One way to do this would be to set $\delta_k = \min\{\delta, 1\}$. – Benjamin Dickman Nov 22 '12 at 8:52
@B.D: Thanks. I really forgot that. – Chan Nov 22 '12 at 8:54
up vote 1 down vote accepted

It is a simple application of the product rule which states: If $x_t$ and $y_t$ are two functions such that $\lim_{t \rightarrow a}x_t$ and $\lim_{t \rightarrow a}y_t$ exist, then $$\lim_{t \rightarrow a}x_t y_t = \lim_{t \rightarrow a}x_t \lim_{t \rightarrow a}y_t$$.

But as others have given the rigorous version of the solution, I needn't.

Your proof for the record is indeed correct. While working with multiple limits, consider tactics like taking $\delta < \min(\delta_1,\delta_2)$, where $\delta_1$ and $\delta_2$ are the "$\delta$" for individual sequences(assuming you understand what I am talking about).

share|cite|improve this answer

I am very rusty on Maths, so please forgive me for this naive solution. I hope this is not incorrect or incomplete. This is how I see it:

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to a} \dfrac{f(x)}{(x - a)^n} = 0$


$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to a} (x - a)^k = 0$ for $k \geq 0$

Also, consider $n - k \geq 0$ if $0 \leq k \leq n$. From this and above,

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to a} (x - a)^{n - k} = 0$ for $0 \leq k \leq n$

Multiplying both, we get:

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to a} \dfrac{f(x)}{(x - a)^n} \cdot \displaystyle\lim_{x\to a} (x - a)^{n - k} = 0$ for $0 \leq k \leq n$

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to a} \dfrac{f(x) \cdot (x - a)^{n - k}}{(x - a)^n} = 0$ for $0 \leq k \leq n$

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to a} \dfrac{f(x)}{(x - a)^k} = 0$ for $0 \leq k \leq n$

Hence proved.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.