Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I have a covariance matrix with rank less than full, I can discard of a variable as long as the remaining variables still span the original space.

But let's say I discover that for $3\times 3$ covariance matrix, I get that $r_1=r_2+r_3$ for a matrix row $r$. Does this mean that $X_1=X_2+X_3$?


*Edit: Maybe I should refine it a bit. My question is about the link from dependency in the covariance matrix, which represents only the 2nd order statistics, and the liner dependency (not statistical dependency) of the variables. Thanks.

share|cite|improve this question
Anyone? The question is really about the link between linear dependency in the covariance matrix, and linear dependency in the random variables. – yoki Nov 22 '12 at 6:03
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Okay, I found the answer.

Let $\Lambda$ be the covariance matrix for some random vector $X$.

A singular covariance matrix implies there's a nonzero vector $y$ s.t. $y'\Lambda y = 0$. This would indicate that there exists a random variable $Y=y'X$ for which $var(Y)=var(y'X)=y'\Lambda y=0$, hence it is known w.p. 1.

Since $Y=y_0$ w.p.1 we know that there exists some linear combination s.t. $y_0=\sum b_i X_i$ and hence $\frac{y_0}{b_1} - \sum_{i=2}^N \frac{b_i}{b_1}X_i = X_1$, or: one of the variables is a.s. a linear combination of the others.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.