Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $T_1$ and $T_2$ be two linear transformations from $R^n$ to $R^1$. If $ker(T_1)=ker(T_2)$, show that there is a non-zero constant $a$ such that $T_1(v)=aT_2(v)$ for all $v\in R^n$

My Attempt-

Analysis: I need to achieve $T_1(v)=aT_2(v)$, that is $Av=aBv$

Since $T_1$ and $T_2$ are mappings from $R^n$ to $R^1$, they must both be $1\ X\ n$ row matrices. (Not sure how this will help.)

Let the standard matrix for $T_1$ and $T_2$ be A and B respectively. Therefore, $ker(T_1)$ is the solution space of $Ax=0$ and similarily, $ker(T_2)$ is the solution space of $Bx=0$

I am not making any progress. Can anyone guide me in the right direction? Thanks Stack!@ Owe you one again and again.

share|cite|improve this question
Per chance you could try $a=T_1(1)/T_2(1)$?And use the fact that $Ker(T_1)=Ker(T_2)$ is either =$R^n$ or =$R^{n-1}$. – awllower Nov 21 '12 at 12:29
Related:… – wj32 Nov 21 '12 at 12:30
@awllower I can't rmemeber learning that Ker(T1)=Ker(T2) is either R^n or R^n-1. Can you show me a quick proof of that, is that is convenient? or maybe link me to a similar question. Thanks! – Yellow Skies Nov 21 '12 at 12:41
It was not supposed to be 1, but any generator of the complement of the kernel of the transformations. Sorry for that error. – awllower Nov 21 '12 at 12:45
I still don't quite understand. What is a generator? I am beginning my course in linear algebra haha. Sorry and thanks!@ – Yellow Skies Nov 21 '12 at 12:46
up vote 5 down vote accepted

We consider two cases: If $\ker T_1 = \mathbb R^n$, we have $T_1 = 0$, and by $\ker T_2 = \mathbb R^n$ also $T_2 = 0$. Then $a = 1$ will do.

Otherwise, $\ker T_1$ is a $n-1$ dimensional subspace of $\mathbb R^n$, let $x \in \mathbb R^n \setminus \ker T_1$. As $\ker T_1$ is $(n-1)$-dimensional, we have $\ker T_1 \oplus \langle x \rangle = \mathbb R^n$. We have $T_2(x) \ne 0$, as $x \not\in \ker T_2 = \ker T_1$, now let $a := \frac{T_1(x)}{T_2(x)}$. Let $y \in \mathbb R^n$, then $y$ can be written as $y = u + \lambda x$ with $u \in \ker T_1$, $\lambda \in \mathbb R$. We have \begin{align*} T_1(y) &= T_1(u) + \lambda T_1(x)\\ &= \lambda T_1(x)\\ &= \lambda a T_2(x)\\ &= a T_2(u) + a\lambda T_2(x)\\ &= aT_2(u+ \lambda x)\\ &= a T_2(y). \end{align*} As $y$ was arbitrary, $T_1 = aT_2$.

share|cite|improve this answer

We have $$ T_1(x)=v_1\cdot x,\ T_2(x)=v_2\cdot x \quad \forall x \in \mathbb{R}^n $$ for some $v_1,v_2 \in \mathbb{R}^n$. Since $$ \ker(T_1)=v_1^\perp=\ker(T_2)=v_2^\perp, $$ it follows that $v_2=a v_1$ for some nonzero real constant $a$. Hence for every $x \in \mathbb{R}^n$ we have $$ T_2(x)=a(v_1\cdot x)=aT_1(x). $$

share|cite|improve this answer
Is that inverted T a symbol for transpose? – Yellow Skies Nov 21 '12 at 12:50
No, it means the orthogonal complement of the subspace generated by that vector, at least so I suppose. – awllower Nov 21 '12 at 12:52
For a subset $U$ of $\mathbb{R}^n$ the notation $U^\perp$ stands for the orthogonal complement of $U$, i.e. $U^\perp=\{x \in \mathbb{R}^n:\ x\cdot u=0 \quad \forall\ u \in U\}$. – Mercy King Nov 21 '12 at 12:52
Nice geometric interpretation! – awllower Nov 21 '12 at 12:53
Ok this looks like what I am looking for, but just one last problem haha, either I forgot, or this was not on my textbook, but $$ \ker(T_1)=v_1^\perp=\ker(T_2)=v_2^\perp, $$ I don't understand. – Yellow Skies Nov 21 '12 at 12:55

If $\dim( \ker( T_1))=n$ is easy. So assume $\dim( \ker( T_1))\neq n \Rightarrow T_1 \neq0$.
The exercise suggest to define $\alpha$ as $\alpha=\dfrac{T_1(u)}{T_2(u)}$ for some $u$ with $T_1(u)\neq 0$.
If $T_1(v)\neq 0$ then $v-\dfrac{T_1(v)}{T_1(u)}u \in \ker( T_1)=\ker( T_2)$.
Thus $T_2\left(v-\dfrac{T_1(v)}{T_1(u)}u\right)=0 \Rightarrow T_2(v)=\dfrac{T_1(v)}{T_1(u)}T_2(u)=\dfrac{1}{\alpha}T_1(v) \Rightarrow T_1(v)=\alpha T_2(v).$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.