Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider the law of composition $(x,y) \rightarrow \sqrt[3]{x^3+y^3}$ on the set of real numbers. Show that this law of composition defines a group isomorphic to the additive group ($G$) of $\mathbb{R}$.

My attempt: So I know the additive group on $\mathbb{R}$ is just the set of all real numbers that 1) have an identity such that : $x+e = e+x$ for all $x \in G$ i.e. ($e=0$) 2) have an additive inverse 3) are associative

My confusion arises because Im not sure what composition of two elements for instance $(x_1,y_1) \circ (x_2,y_2)$ looks like. Do I add $\sqrt[3]{x_1^3+y_1^3} + \sqrt[3]{x_2^3+y_2^3}$ which then has two values both in $\mathbb{R}$ and then I can see that we are just adding real numbers, which makes sense for the isomorphism, or is the law of composition $\sqrt[3]{(x_1+x_2)^3+(y_1+y_2)^3}$, in which case im a bit lost.

How do I know which is the proper way to compose in the original group? Im heavily leaning towards the first option, because then we can have that $(0,0)$ be our identity element, and $-(x,y)$ be our inverse and we have a subgroup, but I dont understand why this is the law of composition to choose.

In terms of showing that it is an isomorphism, unfortunatley, I am completely lost.

Any help is appreciated, thanks!

share|improve this question
2  
The law of composition given in the problem does not give a group structure on $\mathbb{R}^2$, but on $\mathbb{R}$. That is, it defines the group $(\mathbb{R}, *)$, where $a * b = \sqrt[3]{x^3+y^3}$. –  Mikko Korhonen Nov 19 '12 at 22:36

3 Answers 3

up vote 2 down vote accepted

First of all, both of your proposed composition laws are incorrect. Recall that a composition law is a way of taking two elements of your group and getting a third, i.e., taking $x$ and $y$ to get $z$. Now if we compose the result with $w$, what we should get is $(x*y)*w=z*w.$ One thing this means is that applying composition twice is a function that takes three elements and gives us a fourth. Your mistake was treating elements of the group as pairs of numbers, when actually each element is a single real number. So let's see what that means in the context of the group here. Let $z=x*y=\sqrt[3]{x^3+y^3}.$ Then $$(x*y)*w=z*w=\sqrt[3]{z^3+w^3}=\sqrt[3]{(\sqrt[3]{x^3+y^3})^3+w^3}=\sqrt[3]{x^3+y^3+w^3}.$$ That's pretty neat! It means that in this group, it's easy to compute things: $x*y*z$ is just $\sqrt[3]{x^3+y^3+z^3}.$ So now let's look for the desired isomorphism with $\mathbb{R}.$ Call the isomorphism $\phi:\mathbb{R}:\to$ your group. We know because $\phi$ is a homomorphism that $$\phi(x+y)=\phi(x)*\phi(y)=\sqrt[3]{\phi(x)^3+\phi(y)^3}$$ and that $\phi$ must have an inverse $\phi^{-1}$ so that $$\phi^{-1}(\sqrt[3]{x^3+y^3})=\phi^{-1}(x*y)=\phi^{-1}(x)+\phi^{-1}(y).$$ How can we find a $\phi$ satisfying these properties? A good way to begin is to look at the way in which multiplication in your group resembles addition in $\mathbb{R},$ and then to figure out what precise manipulation you'd have to make to switch from one operation to the other.

share|improve this answer

Your group is not on the set $\mathbb{R}^2$, but on $\mathbb{R}$. The composition here is given by $x \oplus y = \sqrt[3]{x^3 + y^3}$.

An isomorphism from $G = (\mathbb{R},+)$ to this group is given by $x \mapsto x^{1/3}$. I leave it to you to verify that this works.

share|improve this answer
    
I'm curious. Do you think that it would be preferred that the given mapping is from $(\mathbb{Z}, \circ)$ to $(\mathbb{Z},+)$ rather than the other way around? I'm aware this is a very minor point, but people often make a big deal about the minor points. In my opinion, it matters very little since isomorphism is an equivalence relation in this context. –  000 Nov 19 '12 at 22:52
    
I appreciate this insight and between this and some of the other points brought up I understand the correct way to interpret this. What im now wondering now is what would be the difference in the notation if my set were on $\mathbb{R}^2$. –  MSEoris Nov 19 '12 at 22:56
1  
I am not certain, but I don't think you have an implied extension to $\mathbb{R}^2$. You could define it yourself in a certain way, but there is no implication of what it means given the definition $x\circ y:=\sqrt[3]{x^3+y^3}$. I may be wrong, but I have no clue how one would interpret $(x_1,y_1)\circ(x_2,y_2):=\sqrt[3]{(x_1,y_1)^3+(x_2,y_2)^3}$, which is the only natural implication of the notation. –  000 Nov 19 '12 at 23:01

I approach this question by figuring out the most fundamental question: What is the isomorphism here, if there is one?

First of all, the isomorphism has to be from $(\mathbb{R},\circ)$ to $(\mathbb{R},+)$ with $x\circ y:=\sqrt[3]{x^3+y^3}.$ Thus, we know that it is $f: (\mathbb{R},\circ) \to (\mathbb{R}, +)$.

We have, of course, the primary condition of an isomorphism (using our $f$ and aforementioned notation): $$f(a \circ b)=f(a)+f(b) \quad \forall a,b \in (\mathbb{R}, \circ).$$

Our choice of $f$, then, would be $f(z)=z^{3}$. We see that this satisfies the primary condition of an isomorphism:

$$ \begin{align} f(a\circ b)&=\left(\sqrt[3]{a^3+b^3}\right)^3\\ &=a^3+b^3.\\ f(a)&=a^3.\\ f(b)&=b^3.\\ \therefore f(a\circ b)&=f(a)+f(b). \end{align} $$

Thus, we have an isomorphism and we can state $(\mathbb{R}, \circ)\cong (\mathbb{R}, +)$.

N.B. The identity and inverses are trivially preserved. If necessary, show that.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the edit, MSEoris. –  000 Nov 20 '12 at 21:41

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.