Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The question is:

Let $F$ be a field. $F$ is a vector space over itself which we'll represent as $V$. Find all the vector sub-spaces of $V$ and prove your answer.

After thinking about it, I'm pretty sure the only subspace of $V$ is $V$ itself. Since for every element we remove (Let's say $V_2 +V_3 = V_1 $) the elements $V_2$ or $V_3 $ can't be in the subspace either otherwise the closure axiom wouldn't hold, and the cycle continues.

But, after thinking a little longer, I have no idea how to prove it. I don't know how I can say that every element is the result of addition of two other elements. Also I have no idea how to prove this will result in no elements in the subspace.

share|improve this question
3  
What are ideals of a field? –  Alexei Averchenko Nov 19 '12 at 16:35
2  
If $V=F$ is a field considered as a vector space over itself, $V$ is not the only subspace. You also have the other trivial subspace $(0)$. –  Andrea Mori Nov 19 '12 at 17:05
    
Thanks for the edits! English is not my mother language so translating is sometimes difficult for me. –  Nescio Nov 19 '12 at 17:37
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Hint: Try and find a basis of $F$, which will give you it's dimension. The dimension of any subspace is less than or equal to the dimension of $F$. (And indeed, for any finite dimensional vector space there exists a (non-unique) subspace for any dimension smaller than the dimension of the original space.)

If $F$ has no subspaces other than itself (and $ \{0\} $, which is a subspace of any vector space!) this tells us what the dimension is, and conversely, having this particular dimension tells us what the possible subspaces are!

share|improve this answer
add comment

Hint: Vector subspaces are closed under multiplication by scalars. If $v$ is a non-zero element of $V$, can you produce any other element of $V$ through multiplication by a scalar?

share|improve this answer
    
Ok, that did help me. I now know that if $1_F\in U$ it can't be a vector subspace. But I'm not sure what happens if $1_F\notin U$, since the axioms for vector spaces don't require a vector identity element, right? –  Nescio Nov 19 '12 at 17:36
    
@Nescio: The hint wasn't to assume that $1_F\in U$, but that some $0\ne v\in U$. Is $v^{-1}v$ in $U$? –  joriki Nov 19 '12 at 17:54
    
@Nescio: By the way, I think you mean that if $1_F\in U$, then $U$ can't be a proper vector subspace. $V$ itself is a vector subspace of $V$, but not a proper vector subspace. –  joriki Nov 19 '12 at 17:57
    
In the end, after actually understanding how to use the dimensions, I found the other way simpler. But thanks for the help! –  Nescio Nov 21 '12 at 11:29
    
@Nescio: A good example showing that the number of upvotes doesn't necessarily reflect the utility of the answer to the person who asked the question... –  joriki Nov 21 '12 at 12:17
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.