Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $f : \mathbb{C} \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ and let $\gamma_a$ be a continuous family of paths in the complex plane going from $0$ to $a$.

Which restrictions have to be imposed on $f$ to make $F(a)=\int_{\gamma_a}f(x)\mathrm{d}x$ holomorphic on some open set U?

share|cite|improve this question
Look at Morera's theorem and the related problem. – Mhenni Benghorbal Nov 19 '12 at 0:01
up vote 2 down vote accepted

"Holomorphic at $a$" is sometimes (always?) taken to mean "complex-differentiable at every point in some open neighborhood of $a$". If $F$ is holomorphic at $a$, then some standard results say that for some $c_n$, $n=0,1,2,\ldots\,{}$, $$ F(z) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty c_n (z-a)^n $$ for $|z-a|<\text{some positive number}$. The series converges, and what it converges to is the right thing, $F(z)$. Another standard theorem says that in the interior of the disk of convergence, power series can be differentiated term-by-term, and the derivative has at least as large a radius of convergence. Consequently $F$ has derivatives of all orders in some open neighborhood of $a$. And yet another standard result says $F'=f$ in that neighborhood. So $f$ must itself by expressible as a convergent power series in that neighborhood. Bottom line: $f$ must itself be holomorphic at $a$, in order that $F$ be holomorphic at $a$.

share|cite|improve this answer
The definition at the outset of my answer is intended to distinguish holomorphic functions from something like $z\mapsto|z|^2$, which is differentiable at $0$ (and only at $0$) but not holomorphic at $0$, in the sense defined. – Michael Hardy Nov 18 '12 at 23:37
If I am not mistaken, this is a necessary condition. Could you think of a sufficient one? I have updated my question to make it clearer that I am looking for a sufficient condition. – Friedrich Nov 19 '12 at 12:04
You speak of integrating along a "continuous family of paths" rather than along a path. That is at best unclear. Before I would attempt to be precise about sufficient conditions, I wouldn't mind seeing something precise about how $F$ is defined. Does the integral from $0$ to $a$ depend on which path is chosen? If so, then you may have a "multiple-valued" $F$ with different branches. On different branches $F$ would differ by a constant, so the derivative would still be $f$. But it would be holomorphic on each branch separately. – Michael Hardy Nov 19 '12 at 14:23
What I mean by "family of paths" is that there should be one path for each endpoint $a$. So the family could for example be the straight lines going from $0$ to $a$. If it helps, I don't mind restricting the analyis to this family. – Friedrich Nov 19 '12 at 19:59
You say $f:\mathbb C\to\mathbb C$. That makes things a lot simpler than if you had $f:\text{some subset of }\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}$. It implies that $F$ will be the same regardless of which path one takes from $0$ to $a$. That being the case, the necessary condition is sufficient. Difficulties come when the domain has holes. If, for example, $f$ is undefined at $2$, One could take a path from $0$ to $3$ that goes "below" $2$ and another than goes "above" $2$, and get different results. In that case, you might have $F_1$ defined near $2$ and at every point on the first path, and..... – Michael Hardy Nov 19 '12 at 22:40

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.