Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $p\in(1,+\infty)$ and consider the space $\ell^p$ with its usual norm. The following are equivalent:

(1) $x_n \rightharpoonup x$ (i.e. $x_n$ weakly converges to $x$);

(2) $$\exists M>0: \quad \sup_{n} \Vert x_n \Vert_p \le M \quad \text{ and } \quad \forall k\in\mathbb N: \,\,\ x^{(k)}_n\to x^{(k)}$$

I think I've proved (1) $\Rightarrow$ (2): indeed, every weak convergent sequence is bounded (hence we get $\sup_{n} \Vert x_n \Vert_p \le M$ for some positive $M$); on the other hand, we can simply observe that the "projections" $p_k \colon \ell^{p} \to \mathbb R$ definde by $x=(x_n)_{n=1}^{\infty} \mapsto x_k$ are linear and continuous. So, briefly, we have that weak convergence implies boundness and pointwise convergence.

What about (2) $\Rightarrow$ (1)? I'm really puzzled and I don't know how to begin. Thanks in advance.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

There is a more general result.

Theorem. Let $E$ be a normed space. Let $\{x_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}\subset E$ and $x\in E$, then the following conditions are equivalent:

  • $\{x_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}$ weakly converges to $x\in E$
  • $\{x_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}$ is bounded and for all $S\subset E^*$ such that $\mathrm{cl}(\mathrm{span} S)=E^*$ holds $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty} f(x_n)=f(x)$ for all $f\in S$.

Proof. Assume $\{x_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}$ weakly converges to $x$. Then it is well knonw that $\{x_n:\in\mathbb{N}\}$ is bounded. Moreover for all $f\in X^*$ we know that $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}f(x_n)=f(x)$. Hence for all $S\subset X^*$ such that $\mathrm{cl}(\mathrm{span}S)=X^*$ we have $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}f(x_n)=f(x)$ for all $f\in S$.

Assume that $\{x_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}$ is bounded by some conatant $M>0$ and for all $S\subset X^*$ such that $\mathrm{cl}(\mathrm{span}S)=X^*$ holds $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}f(x_n)=f(x)$ for all $f\in S$. Take arbitrary $g\in\mathrm{span}S$, then $g=\sum\limits_{k=1}^m \alpha_k f_k$. Then it is easy to check that $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}g(x_n)=g(x)$. So for all $g\in\mathrm{span}S$ we have $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}g(x_n)=g(x)$. Now take arbitrary $g\in X^*=\mathrm{cl}(\mathrm{span}S)$, then $g=\lim\limits_{k\to\infty} g_k$ for some $\{g_k:k\in\mathbb{N}\}\subset\mathrm{span}S$. Fix arbitrary $\varepsilon>0$. Since $g=\lim\limits_{k\to\infty} g_k$, then there exist $K\in\mathbb{N}$ such that $\Vert g-g_k\Vert\leq\varepsilon$ for all $k>K$. Then $$ \begin{align} |g(x_n)-g(x)| &\leq|g(x_n)-g_k(x_n)|+|g_k(x_n)-g_k(x)|+|g_k(x)-g(x)|\\ &\leq\Vert g-g_k\Vert\Vert x_n\Vert+|g_k(x_n)-g_k(x)|+\Vert g_k-g\Vert\Vert x\Vert\\ &\leq\varepsilon M+|g_k(x_n)-g_k(x)|+\varepsilon\Vert x\Vert \end{align} $$ Let's take a limit $n\to\infty$ in this inequality, then $$ \limsup\limits_{n\to\infty}|g(x_n)-g(x)|\leq \varepsilon M+\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}|g_k(x_n)-g_k(x)|+\varepsilon\Vert x\Vert $$ Since $g_k\in\mathrm{span}S$, then $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}|g_k(x_n)-g_k(x)|=0$ and we get $$ \limsup\limits_{n\to\infty}|g(x_n)-g(x)|\leq \varepsilon M+\varepsilon\Vert x\Vert $$ Since $\varepsilon>0$ is arbitrary we conclude $\limsup\limits_{n\to\infty}|g(x_n)-g(x)|=0$. This is equivalent to $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}|g(x_n)-g(x)|=0$ i.e. $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}g(x_n)=g(x)$. Since $g\in X^*$ is arbitrary, then $\{x_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}$ weakly converges to $x$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Let $L\in(\ell^p)'$ a linear continuous functional. We can assume that $x_n^{(k)}\to 0$ for all $k$. $L$ can be represent by an element $v$ of $\ell^q$, where $p^{-1}+q^{-1}=1$. Fix $\delta>0$ and $v'$ of finite support such that $\lVert v-v'\rVert_{\ell^q}\leqslant \delta$. Then $$\lVert L(x_n)\rVert\leqslant\delta+|\langle v',x_n\rangle_{\ell^q,\ell^p}|,$$ giving what we want.

share|cite|improve this answer

Let $X$ be a general Banach space and $X^*$ its dual. Then the weak topology on a bounded subset of $X$ is determined by a dense subset of $X^*$ in the sense:

If $D\subset X^*$ is dense and $(x_\alpha)\subset X$ is uniformly bounded in norm, then $x_\alpha$ converges to $x$ weakly if and only if $x_\alpha(d)\to x(d)$ for all $d\in D$.

With this and assuming 2). The first says $x_n$ are uniformly bounded in norm, while the second one says $x_n$ converges pointwise on sum dense subset of $\ell^q$ (I am pretty sure you can figure out this dense subset). So the result follows.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.