Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm finding it difficult to find any non-geometrical derivation of coordinate conversions from cartisan to spherical.

I can understand the derivations geometrically, because I can visualize the construction. However, if I would want to find n-spherical coordinates conversions, how would I do so?

In other words, how do I go from 2D:

\begin{align} x & =r\cos\theta \\[6pt] y & =r\sin\theta \\[6pt] \end{align}

to 3D:

\begin{align} z & =r\cos\theta \\[6pt] y & =r\sin\theta\sin\phi \\[6pt] x & =r\sin\theta\cos\phi \\[6pt] \end{align}

to 4D:

\begin{align} w & =r\cos\theta \\[6pt] z & =r\sin\theta\cos\phi \\[6pt] y & =r\sin\theta\sin\phi\sin\psi \\[6pt] x & =r\sin\theta\sin\phi\cos\psi \\[6pt] \end{align}

and etc..

Ok, I can see a pattern to emerge and can guess that 5D is:

\begin{align} v & =r\cos\theta \\[6pt] w & =r\sin\theta\cos\phi \\[6pt] z & =r\sin\theta\sin\phi\cos\psi \\[6pt] y & =r\sin\theta\sin\phi\sin\psi\sin\delta \\[6pt] x & =r\sin\theta\sin\phi\sin\psi\cos\delta \\[6pt] \end{align}

But why?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

You know that if the point $(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n)$ lies on the sphere of radius $r$, then $$x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2=r^2.$$ Now $x_1$ ranges from $-r$ to $r$, so we can let $x_1 = r\cos\theta_1$ for $\theta_1\in[0,\pi]$. Then $$\begin{align} x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2&=r^2-x_1^2\\ &=(r\sin\theta_1)^2, \end{align}$$ so $(x_2,\ldots,x_n)$ lies on a sphere of radius $r\sin\theta_1$. (This is sensible because $\sin\theta_1\ge0$ when $\theta\in[0,\pi]$.) Then we continue to do the same thing: $$x_2=(r\sin\theta_1)\cos\theta_2,$$ $$\begin{align} x_3+\cdots+x_n&=(r\sin\theta_1)^2-x_2^2\\ &=(r\sin\theta_1\sin\theta_2)^2, \end{align}$$ $$x_3=(r\sin\theta_1\sin\theta_2)\cos\theta_3,$$ $$\vdots$$ You have to be a little careful when you get down to $x_{n-1}$. Either set the range of $\theta_{n-1}$ to $[0,2\pi]$ to cover the full circle in two dimensions, or let $x_n=\pm r\sin\theta_1\sin\theta_2\cdots\sin\theta_{n-1}$ because the circle in one dimension contains two points.

share|cite|improve this answer
Wow, this is pretty cool! I can see how it all works now. Thanks! – Zchpyvr Nov 18 '12 at 2:07

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.