Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Statement 1:

A function $f$ satisfies a Lipschitz condition in the rectangular region $D$ if there is a positive real number $L$ such that $$|f(t, u) - f(t, v)| \leq L|u - v|$$ for all $(t,u) \in D$ and $(t, v) \in D$.

Statement 2:

There is a finite, positive, real number $L$ such that $$|\frac{d}{dy}f(t, y)| \leq L$$ for all $(t,y) \in D$.

Is this statement stronger than (i.e., more restrictive then), equivalent to or weaker than (i.e., less restrictive than) statement 1? Justify your answer.

My view:

I would say the statements are equivalent the max 'slope' for any two points in statement 1 won't exceed the max slope in statement 2.

share|cite|improve this question
You can have a Lipschitz function not differentiable in one point. – Tomás Nov 17 '12 at 14:01
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Statement 2 is stronger than Statement 1.

Define $f:\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ by $$ f(t,u):=g(t)h(u),\text{ for all }(t,u)\in\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R} $$ where $g:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ is bounded and $h:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ is Lipschitz. Then, $f$ satisfies the Statement 1 everywhere, whereas Statement 2 is satisfied only upto almost evereywhere (Rademacher Theorem).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.