Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Vi Hart's doodling videos and a 4 year old son interested in mazes has made me wonder:

What are some interesting mathematical "doodling" diversions/games that satisfy the following criteria:

1) They are "solitaire" games, i.e. require only one player; 2) They require only a pencil and blank sheet of paper; 3) They don't rely on abstract mathematical language/substitutions. More precisely, I'm interested in "picture" type games with very simple rules, and not the cheeky answer: "mathematics".

What I'd really like to see is a game with simple rules that, out of the planarity of a sheet of paper, somehow "generates" a maze for the player from the "automaton" type rules...A good starting point may be a solitaire version of dots-and-boxes or something like this...

If such a thing is impossible, under certain simple desirable assumptions, I'd like to see proofs of such a fact, too.

share|cite|improve this question
This should probably be made Community Wiki. – robjohn Nov 17 '12 at 6:04
@robjohn: Already flagged it for you happen to know if it's possible to CW a question without moderator help? – Jon Bannon Nov 17 '12 at 18:55
If you don't see the Community Wiki checkbox when you start to edit the post, then you have to flag a moderator. I have converted your question to CW. – robjohn Nov 18 '12 at 0:14
I don't ever see the checkbox when I ask a there anything I can do about this? – Jon Bannon Nov 18 '12 at 14:15
Evidently, the Community Wiki check-box on questions is mod-only, so you have to flag a moderator to make a question CW. – robjohn Nov 18 '12 at 16:45

You could draw an elementary cellular automaton with random initial row.

share|cite|improve this answer

Or run a turmite which moves on a grid of square cells, and never "decreases" the colour of a cell (where this colour is viewed as a number). Represent cell-colours as e.g. $\Box, \boxminus, \boxplus, \blacksquare$ (where every cell starts as $\Box$), so you never need to rub anything out.

For example ($r=90^\circ $ turn clockwise, etc.)

$\begin{array}{c|cc}\text{old} & \text{new} & \text{turn} \\ \Box & \boxminus & r \\ \boxminus & \boxplus & f \\ \boxplus & \blacksquare & u \\ \blacksquare & \blacksquare & f \end{array}$

If we call this $rfuf$ for short (from the above table's right-hand column) then the following are some more 4-colour turmites whose behaviour is not trivial: $rflf, rrlf, rurf, rulf, rlrf$. Unfortunately the most interesting turmites can both increase and decrease the number for a cell's colour, so running such a turmite on paper would need a pencil and a lot of rubbing out. For simplicity, I've kept to 1-state turmites so you don't have to keep track of the turmite's state as you doodle.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.