Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

So, it's been a long time since I've studied math, so I'm having more trouble with this problem than I thought I would as for some help. I have an arithmetic sequence $0,...,99$ with the difference being $1$. Basically I have numbers $0$ to $99$. The sum of this sequence is $4950$. If I then say that the sum $1797 = 0,...,n$, how would I find $n$?

I've gotten to the point in my equation where $2(1797) = n * (n+1)$ but I don't know where to go from here.

Also, obviously, there is no whole number solution to this particular issue, however there is a rational one and that's what I am looking for.

share|improve this question
1  
It's a quadratic equation. And so it will have 2 roots. Solve it using the quadratic formula. If the result is not rational, then too bad. –  Gautam Shenoy Nov 15 '12 at 16:48
    
Perhaps "rational" is not the right word... It has been awhile. –  davethegr8 Nov 16 '12 at 15:41
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Use simple formula for quadratic equations. Re-writing your equation you get $n^2 + n - 2*1797 = 0$. The number by $n^2$ is customarily named $a$, the one by $n$ is $b$ and the third one $c$.

There are two solutions given by: $\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$ which gives us both solutions i.e. $\frac{-1\pm\sqrt{14377}}{2}$

share|improve this answer
    
It doesn't make sense to say $0,...,\frac{-1\pm\sqrt{14377}}2$, though. What does that even mean? –  Cameron Buie Nov 15 '12 at 17:03
    
@Cameron this would be a useful tool, though, if the problem were slightly modified to ask, "What is the largest $n$ for which $1+2+3+\cdots + n \le 1797$?" –  Rick Decker Nov 15 '12 at 17:18
    
True, @Rick, or if we wanted the least $n$ such that $1+2+3+\cdots+n\geq 1797$. –  Cameron Buie Nov 15 '12 at 17:23
    
@CameronBuie That was the colsest I could get to: "obviously, there is no whole number solution to this particular issue, however there is a rational one and that's what I am looking for." I'm closer then any $\varepsilon$ you pick to some rational number ;) –  Golob Nov 15 '12 at 23:22
    
Ok, so rational's not the right term. But both of those examples are the kind of thing I needed. –  davethegr8 Nov 16 '12 at 15:42
add comment

You are right you want to solve $2\cdot 1797=n(n+1)$, which is $n^2+n-3594$. You can look to factor this or use the quadratic equation to get $$n=\frac{-1\pm\sqrt{1+4\cdot 3594}}2$$ Which has solutions about $-60.5$ and $59.5$. Neither of these is rational as $14377$ is not a square.

share|improve this answer
    
It's been awhile... basically I was looking for the larger one and I guess rational isn't the right term to use. –  davethegr8 Nov 16 '12 at 15:42
add comment

We typically use $n$ to denote (non-negative) integers, but that isn't a huge deal.

If you're talking about an arithmetic sequence with difference $1$ starting at $0$, then every number in the sequence will be a non-negative integer. There's no avoiding that.

If we're not constrained to a difference of $1$, then you may as well just take the sequence to be $0,1797$. There's really no need to to get into sequences with non-integer rational difference.

share|improve this answer
    
Sorry, I'm having a hard time figuring out how to describe this problem. Basically, if $4950=sum(1...99)$ then $1797=sum(1...x)$ –  davethegr8 Nov 15 '12 at 16:54
    
I understand what you're trying to do. Here's the kicker, though: what does "..." mean in the context of $1,...,x$ for arbitrary $x$? There's a natural interpretation when $x$ is a positive integer--namely, that we're talking about an arithmetic sequence with difference $1$. You've already noticed, though, that there's no integer solution to $x^2+x=2(1797)$--in fact, there isn't even a rational solution (not that it would make sense, anyway). –  Cameron Buie Nov 15 '12 at 16:57
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.