Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question explains that scale-invariance (or more accurately, similarity) is an important property of Euclidean geometry. Are there any other ways to define scale-invariant geometries in any sense? And how do they differ from Euclidean geometry?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

If you accept Euclid's first four postulates, then as the question you mention discusses, being able to scale an object (a triangle) implies the parallel postulate and Euclidean geometry.

So any other geometry will be significantly different from what we learned in school.

Here are a few examples of some other scale invariant geometries:

These are just a few; an exhaustive list is impossible.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.