Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $Q_1,\ldots,Q_s \in k[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$, where $k$ is not necessarily algebraically closed (I'm thinking of $k$ as some field with positive characteristic $p$). I'm somewhat new to the world of classical algebraic geometry, so the following may be trivial questions:

Let $V = V(Q_1,\ldots,Q_s)$. Decompose $V = V_1 \cup \cdots \cup V_m$, where each of the $V_i$ are irreducible.

  1. Is there a bound on the number of irreducible components, $m$, that depends on the degrees of the $Q_j$'s?
  2. Let each of the $V_i$'s be defined by polynomials $f_{i1},f_{i2},\ldots$. If the the original $Q_j$'s are of low degree, can we bound the degrees of the $f_{ik}$'s?


share|cite|improve this question
If you work with projective space instead of affine space, I believe the answer to both questions is yes. (But both require a fair bit of machinery). The first utilizes the fact that Chow ring of projective space is just $Z[t]$, so the degree of the intersection is the product of the degrees of the polynomials, and each $V_i$ has positive degree, so $m \le $ the product of the degrees of the $Q_i.$ – only Nov 14 '12 at 14:11
As to the second question, I am much less sure if this works, but I think that it can be done by some fiddling with Hilbert polynomials and invoking some standard lemmas (which use Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity) used in the construction of the Hilbert scheme. You can probably reduce the affine case by taking closures to the projective case, and I see no issues, but I have no access to paper at the moment, and can't check anything. So, neither of these questions are trivial at all; the second one is strongly related to a crucial step in the construction of the Hilbert scheme. – only Nov 14 '12 at 14:18

This is not really an answer - which I leave to the experts - just a (possibly useless) thought. Let $R=k[x_1,\dots,x_n]$ and $I=(Q_1,\dots,Q_s)\subset R$ the ideal defining $V$. Each $V_i$ corresponds to a prime ideal $\mathfrak p_i\subset R$ (minimal above those) containing $I$. Let us set $\mathfrak p=\mathfrak p_1$ and work with $V_1=V(\mathfrak p)$ where, as we said, $\mathfrak p=(f_1,\dots,f_r)\supset I$.

Now, the first question is about primary decomposition of $I$. The number $m$ is the number of minimal primes in Ass$_R(R/I)$. I don't know whether there is a bound on $m$. Of course it is $\leq |\textrm{Ass}_R(R/I)|$, but I do not feel like this number could depend on the degree of the $Q_j$'s. Indeed (but it's just a naive idea), consider the integers $\mathbb Z$ and look at some $n=\prod_{i=1}^Mp_i^{e_i}$ where the $e_i$'s can be very large powers, and $p_i$ are prime numbers. Well, if $l=\prod_{i=1}^Mp_i$, then $(n)$ and $(l)$ have the same associated primes, and the number $M$ of such associated primes doesn't depend on how huge the generator $n$ is (whence my thought that, in our situation, $m$ should not depend on how huge is the degree of the generators).

For your second question, I can only observe that for every $j$ one has $Q_j\in\mathfrak p$ so $Q_j=\sum_{i=1}^ra_if_i^{b_i}$ so that $\deg Q_j=\max\,(b_i\cdot\deg f_i)\geq\deg f_h$ for all $1\leq h\leq r$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for your thoughts! Regarding the your last observation, couldn't there be cancellation of the high degree terms in the sum? That is, there can be $f_h$'s such that $\deg f_h \gg \deg Q_j$, but in the sum they cancel. – Henry Yuen Nov 14 '12 at 0:40
Dear Henry, of course you are right. – Brenin Nov 14 '12 at 17:15

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.