Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose that $V$ is an isometry and $X$ an arbitrary operator on a Hilbert space $H$. Let $X=U|X|$ be the polar decomposition for $X$.

If $VX=XV$, can I conclude that $VU=UV$?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted
+500

Edit: No, it does not hold in general. For some reason I always tended to use that $V$ commuted with $X^*$, which in general doesn't have to be true. A counterexample: Let $\mathcal{H}=\ell^2(\mathbb{N})$. Let $V$ be the right shift on $\mathcal{H}$, i.e. $V\delta_n=\delta_{n+1}$ where $\delta_n(m)=\left\{\begin{matrix} 1 & \mbox{if }n=m\\0 & \mbox{if }n \neq m\end{matrix}\right.$. Let $X=2+V$ (so $X\delta_n=2\delta_n+\delta_{n+1}$) then $XV=VX$. However, you can check that $X^*V \neq VX^*$. Now $X$ is invertible, so $U$ is unitary. But then $UV=VU \Leftrightarrow X^*V=VX^*$, which is false.

So the following only holds if $V$ commutes with $X^*$: Let $\mathcal{X}$ be the von Neumann algebra generated by $X$. One can show that in this case $U\in \mathcal{X}$. As clearly $V$ is an element of the commutant of $\mathcal{X}$ and $U \in \mathcal{X}$, we find that $VU=UV$. So I don't think you need the fact that $V$ is an isometry...

share|improve this answer
    
"As clearly $V$ is an element of the commutant of $\mathcal X$." I disagree. $V$ need not commute with $X^*$. If $X$ were normal or $V$ were unitary, this would be valid. –  Jonas Meyer Dec 7 '12 at 16:41
    
@JonasMeyer : the isometry V need not be unitary ???? –  Ewan Delanoy Dec 7 '12 at 16:42
    
@Ewan: Right, in the finite dimensional case $V$ is automatically unitary and it follows that $V$ is in the commutant of $\{X,X^*\}$. So the main problem is determining what can happen when $V$ is a nonunitary isometry, like the unilateral shift on $\ell^2$. –  Jonas Meyer Dec 7 '12 at 16:44
    
I corrected my answer. Now it should hold... –  Jan Keersmaekers Dec 10 '12 at 10:59
1  
@Manny: Suppose to reach a contradiction that $UV=VU$. Then from $VU|X|=U|X|V$ we have $UV|X|=U|X|V$, which upon canceling $U$ yields $V|X|=|X|V$, which upon multiplying both sides by $|X|$ yields $VX^*X=X^*XV$, then again using $XV=VX$ yields $VX^*X=X^*VX$, and finally canceling $X$ yields $VX^*=X^*V$, which is not true because $V^*V\neq VV^*$. –  Jonas Meyer Dec 11 '12 at 17:34

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.