Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

(1) The sum of two rational numbers is a rational number.

(2) The series $\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n}}{2n+1} = \frac{1}{1} - \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5} - \cdots = \frac{\pi}{4}$ is irrational.

The equation (2) is repeating (1) infinitely many times. So, why (2) is not rational? I get that it is the infinity messing things up, but cannot figure out why.

share|cite|improve this question
By the same logic (just replacing "rational" by "finite", which makes no difference to your argument): (1) the sum of two finite numbers is a finite number. Therefore (2) the sum of an infinite number of finite numbers should be a finite number. – TonyK Nov 13 '12 at 20:37
Let $x$ be a real number, for simplicity between $0$ and $1$. Let $x$ have decimal expansion $0.a_1a_2a_3\dots$. Then $x=\frac{a_1}{10}+\frac{a_2}{10^2}+\frac{a_3}{10^3}+\cdots$. So $x$ is the sum of a series with rational terms. – André Nicolas Nov 13 '12 at 20:43
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The problem is that "addition" and "summing" are two different things.

Summing, as in (2) requires both the act of addition and the act of taking limits.

And we know that taking limits of rational numbers does not preserve rationality.

(there is a sequence converging to $\sqrt{2}$ in $\mathbb{Q}$ for example )

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.