Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $x_1,x_2, \ldots, x_n$ be local coordinates on a manifolds $M$. One can interpret $\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}(p)$ as a tangent vetor to a curve with constant $x_j$ (where $j \neq i$). What is the interpretation of $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_i}(p)$ on a complex manifold in local coordinates? I'll be glad for any references.

share|cite|improve this question

I feel like the standard texts are a little brief explaining this. I was confused about it for a really long time. This is going to be a fairly long answer.

First up, lets start with a smooth manifold $M$ with dimension $n$. Let $ \mathscr{S}$ be the sheaf of smooth functions on $M$. More concretely, $ \mathscr{S}(U)$ is the $ \mathbb{R}$-algebra of smooth functions $U \to \mathbb{R}$. We are going to define another sheaf on $M$. Let $ \mathscr{C}$ be the sheaf of complex valued smooth functions on $M$. More concretely, $ \mathscr{C}(U)$ is the $ \mathbb{C}$-algebra of smooth functions $ U \to \mathbb{C}$, where by smooth, I mean that each component function is smooth. It is a standard result from differential geometry that vector fields on $ U \subseteq M$ are the same as $ \mathbb{R}$-linear maps $ D : \mathscr{S}(U) \to \mathscr{S}(U)$ satisfying $D(fg) = f D(g) + g D(f) $. These are called $ \mathbb{R}$-linear derivations.

It is natural to ask the following question: Are the $ \mathbb{C}$-linear derivations $ \mathscr{C}(U) \to \mathscr{C}(U)$ smooth sections of some vector bundle over $U$? The answer is yes! Here is the idea (to make this rigorous quite a lot more work is required. Inpaticular, at some point you need to muck around with partitions of unity). Firstly, if $ D: \mathscr{S}(U) \to \mathscr{S}(U)$ is an $ \mathbb{R}$-linear derivation, then $D(\alpha + i \beta) = D \alpha + i D \beta$ defines a $\mathbb{C}$-linear derivation $ \mathscr{C}(U) \to \mathscr{C}(U)$. Now assume that $U$ is small, $x_1, \dots, x_n$ are coordinates on $U$ and $ D : \mathscr{C}(U) \to \mathscr{C}(U)$ is a $ \mathbb{C}$-derivation. Taylor's theorem tells us that $$ D (\alpha + \beta i) = \sum c_j \frac{\partial (\alpha + \beta i)}{\partial x_j} \quad c_j \in \mathscr{C}(U). $$ This is exactly a smooth section of $$ TM \otimes_{\mathbb R} \mathbb{C} = \coprod_{p \in M} T_p \otimes_{\mathbb R} \mathbb{C} $$ Before we start talking about complex manifolds, notice that we still have the non degenerate pairing $$ TM \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathbb{C} \times TM^* \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathbb{C} \to \mathscr{C} $$ defined by $( \partial / \partial x_i , dx_j) \mapsto \delta_{ij}$. This allows us to define the differential of $ f \in \mathscr{C}(U) $ by $ (\partial / \partial x_i, df) = \partial f / \partial x_i $.

OK, Now let $X$ be a complex manifold with complex dimension $n$. Let $z_j = x_j + i y_j$ be holomorphic coordinates on $U \subseteq X$. Then both $z_j $ and $ \overline{z_j}$ are in $ \mathscr{C}(U)$. Inpaticular, we have that $ dz_j = d x_j + i d y_j $ and $ d \overline{z_j} = dx_j - i dy_j$. From the equations $ 2 dx_j = dz_j + d \overline{z_j}$ and $ 2i dy_j = dz_j - d \overline{z_j} $, it follows that the sections of $ TM^* \otimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathbb{C}$ over $U$ are given by $$ \sum_j f_j dz_j + g_j d \overline{z_j} \quad f_j,g_j \in \mathscr{C}(U) $$ Under the non-degenerate pairing, the dual basis to $ dz_j, d \overline{z_j}$ is given by $$ \frac{\partial}{\partial z_j} = 1/2 \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial x_j} - i \frac{\partial}{\partial y_j} \right) $$ $$ \frac{\partial}{\partial \overline{z_j}} = 1/2 \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial x_j} + i \frac{\partial}{\partial y_j} \right) $$ This is how I think about $ \partial / \partial z_j$.

share|cite|improve this answer

DBr's answer is very good. Here is another way to think about it:

In a smooth manifold, as the OP says, one way to think of $\dfrac{\partial}{\partial {x_i}}$ at $p$ is as taking the derivative along the curve $x_j =$ constant for $j \neq i$. In other words, we get a map $\gamma$ from an interval $I$ around $0$ to the manifold $M$, taking $0$ to $p$, and taking $t$ to $(0,\ldots, t, \ldots, 0)$ (assuming coords. are chosen so that $p$ is at the origin), where $t$ appears in the $i$th place and all other coords. are $0$. We can compose a function $f$ with $\gamma$, and then differentiate $f\circ \gamma$ w.r.t. $t$. This gives the value of $\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x_i}$ at $p$.

Similarly, on a complex manifold with local coords. $z_i$, we may define a map $\gamma$ in exactly the same way, but now taking a n.h. $U$ of $0$ in the complex plane to $M$ (so $t$ is now a complex variable rather than a real one). If $f$ is a holomorphic function on $M$, then the composite $f\circ \gamma$ is a holomorphic function on $x$, and we may differentiate it w.r.t. $t$. This gives $\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial z_i}$ at $p$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.