Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This is another one of the questions I didn't get a chance to ask the TA at my school today. I thought I had a pretty good grasp on Expectations but apparently I could still use some clarification. Hopefully someone can help me.

Suppose that $n$ people take a blood test for a disease, where each person has probability $p$ of having the disease, independent of other persons. To save time and money, blood samples from $k$ people are pooled together. If none of the $k$ persons has the disease then the test will be negative, but otherwise it will be positive. If the pooled test i sportive then each of the $k$ persons is tested separately (so $k+1$ tests are done in that case)

Let $X$ be the number of tests required for a group of $k$ people. Show that

$$ E(X)=k+1-k(1-p)^{k} $$

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

There are two possibilities:

(i) Nobody has the disease. This has probability $(1-p)^k$;

(ii) At least $1$ person has the disease. This has probability $1-(1-p)^k$.

In Case (1), the cost is $1$. In Case (ii), the cost is $1+k$. So if $X$ is the cost, then $$E(X)=(1-p)^k(1) +\left[1-(1-p)^k\right](1+k).$$ We can simplify the above expression a little.

share|cite|improve this answer
That makes a lot more sense now! It didn't really occur to me that I needed to consider each of the k people being diagnosed as separate cases. I just considered it as a whole. Thank you for the clarification :) – TopGunCpp Nov 13 '12 at 5:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.