Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Title says it all. What's more common? Is there one to prefere (maybe due to some norm)?

This:

$\operatorname{\mathfrak{R}} z, \operatorname{\mathfrak{I}} z$

or that:

$\operatorname{Re}z, \operatorname{Im}z$ ?

share|improve this question
3  
It's not "fractal". It's "fraktur". Wikipedia. –  kahen Nov 10 '12 at 15:55
    
Thanks, corrected. –  Foo Bar Nov 10 '12 at 15:58
1  
This is an opinion question which is hard to answer. My own sense is that the fraktur notation is a bit older and less common nowadays. –  Grumpy Parsnip Nov 10 '12 at 15:58
    
Also, the correct "LaTeX-y" way of writing "Re" is "\operatorname{Re}" (or "\DeclareMathOperator{\Re}{Re}" in the preamble). See: tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=newfunction –  kahen Nov 10 '12 at 16:02
3  
Because of Latex I'm actually here. I was wondering if there's a special reason why Latex defaults \Re and \Im to the Fraktur versions. –  Foo Bar Nov 10 '12 at 16:05

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.