Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Tossing a fair coin for $N$ times and we get a result series as $HTHTHHTT\dots~$, Here '$H$' denotes 'head' and '$T$' denotes 'tail' for a specific tossing each time.

What is the probability that the length of the longest streak of consecutive heads is greater than or equal to $k$? (that is we have a $HHHH\dots~$, which is the substring of our tossing result, and whose length is greater than or equal to $k$)

I came up with a recursive solution (though not quite sure), but cannot find a closed form solution.

Here is my solution.

Denote $P(N,k)$ as the probability for tossing the coin $N$ times, and the longest continuous heads is greater or equal than $k$. Then (For $N>k$)

$$ P(N,k)=P(N-1,k)+\Big(1-P(N-k-1,k)\Big)\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{k+1} $$

share|cite|improve this question
    
Your example sequence reminded me of this brilliant Simpsons scene :-) – joriki Nov 10 '12 at 8:58
1  
I'm getting $(N-k+1)/2^k$ for the closed form. Would you like for me to post my solution, or do you want to think about it some more before I spoil the beans? – Braindead Nov 10 '12 at 8:59
    
@Braindead: That can't be right; it's $\gt1$ for small $k$. – joriki Nov 10 '12 at 9:00
    
Duh, you are right. I overcounted. – Braindead Nov 10 '12 at 9:08
    
I tried to clarify some of the formulations; please check whether I preserved the intended meaning. In particular, I assumed that you had merely accidentally written "greater" once instead of "greater or equal". – joriki Nov 10 '12 at 9:12
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Your recurrence relation is correct. I don't think you can do much better than that for general $k$, but you can find a closed form for specific values of $k$. For the first non-trivial value of $k$, the recurrence relation is

$$ p_n=p_{n-1}+(1-p_{n-3})/8\;. $$

With $p_n=1+\lambda^n$, the characteristic equation becomes $\lambda^3-\lambda^2+1/8=0$. One solution, $\lambda=1/2$, can be guessed, and then factoring yields $(\lambda-1/2)(\lambda^2-\lambda/2-1/4)$ with the further solutions $\lambda=(1\pm\sqrt5)/4$. Thus the general solution is

$$p_n=1+c_1\left(\frac12\right)^n+c_2\left(\frac{1+\sqrt5}4\right)^n+c_3\left(\frac{1-\sqrt5}4\right)^n\;.$$

The initial conditions $p_0=0$, $p_1=0$, $p_2=1/4$ determine $c_1=0$, $c_2=-(1+3/\sqrt5)/2$ and $c_3=-(1-3/\sqrt5)/2$, so the probability is

$$ \begin{align} p_n &=1-\frac{1+3/\sqrt5}2\left(\frac{1+\sqrt5}4\right)^n-\frac{1-3/\sqrt5}2\left(\frac{1-\sqrt5}4\right)^n\\ &=1-\frac4{\sqrt5}\left(\left(\frac{1+\sqrt5}4\right)^{n+2}-\left(\frac{1-\sqrt5}4\right)^{n+2}\right)\;. \end{align} $$

Thus, for large $n$ the probability approaches $1$ geometrically with ratio $(1+\sqrt5)/4\approx0.809$.

share|cite|improve this answer
1  
I've added an explicit formula for the $P(N,k)$ which might be of interest to you. Note, that your $p_n=1-\frac{1}{2^n}F_{n+2}$ with $F_n$ the Fibonacci numbers. Regards, – Markus Scheuer Jan 18 at 21:40

We can derive an explicit formula of the probability $P(N,k)$ based upon the Goulden-Jackson Cluster Method.

We consider the set of words $\mathcal{V}^{\star}$ of length $N\geq 0$ built from an alphabet $$\mathcal{V}=\{H,T\}$$ and the bad word $\underbrace{HH\ldots H}_{k \text{ elements }}=:H^k$ which is not allowed to be part of the words we are looking for. We derive a function $f_k(s)$ with the coefficient of $s^N$ being the number of wanted words of length $N$.

The wanted probability $P(N,k)$ can then be written as \begin{align*} P(N,k)=1-\frac{1}{2^N}[s^N]f_k(s) \end{align*}

According to the paper (p.7) from Goulden and Jackson the generating function $f_k(s)$ is \begin{align*} f_k(s)=\frac{1}{1-ds-\text{weight}(\mathcal{C})}\tag{1} \end{align*} with $d=|\mathcal{V}|=2$, the size of the alphabet and with $\mathcal{C}$ the weight-numerator with \begin{align*} \text{weight}(\mathcal{C})=\text{weight}(\mathcal{C}[H^k]) \end{align*} We calculate according to the paper \begin{align*} \text{weight}(\mathcal{C}[H^k])&=-\frac{s^k}{1+s+\cdots+s^{k-1}}=-\frac{s^k(1-s)}{1-s^k} \end{align*}

We obtain the generating function $f(s)$ for the words built from $\{H,T\}$ which don't contain the substring $H^k$ \begin{align*} f_k(s)&=\frac{1}{1-2s+\frac{s^k(1-s)}{1-s^k}}\\ &=\frac{1-s^k}{1-2s+s^{k+1}}\tag{2}\\ \end{align*}

$$ $$

Note: For $k=2$ we obtain \begin{align*} f_2(s)&=\frac{1-s^2}{1-2s+s^{3}}\\ &=1+2s+3s^2+5s^3+8s^4+13s^5+21s^6+34s^7+\mathcal{O}(s^8) \end{align*}

The coefficients of $f_2(s)$ are a shifted variant of the Fibonacci numbers stored as A000045 in OEIS.

Note: For $k=3$ we obtain \begin{align*} f_3(s)&=\frac{1-s^3}{1-2s+s^{4}}\\ &=1+2s+4s^2+7s^3+13s^4+24s^5+44s^6+81s^7+\mathcal{O}(s^8) \end{align*}

The coefficients of $f_3(s)$ are a shifted variant of the so-called Tribonacci numbers stored as A000073 in OEIS.

$$ $$

We use the series representation of $f_k(s)$ in (2) to derive an explicit formula of the coefficients.

\begin{align*} [s^N]f(s)&=[s^N](1-s^k)\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}(2s-s^{k+1})^m\\ &=[s^N](1-s^k)\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}s^m(2-s^k)^m\\ &=[s^N](1-s^k)\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}s^m\sum_{j=0}^m\binom{m}{j}(-1)^js^{kj}2^{m-j}\\ &=([s^N]-[s^{N-k}])\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}s^m\sum_{j=0}^m\binom{m}{j}(-1)^js^{kj}2^{m-j}\tag{3}\\ &=\sum_{m=0}^{N}([s^{N-m}]-[s^{N-k-m}])\sum_{j=0}^m\binom{m}{j}(-1)^js^{kj}2^{m-j}\tag{4}\\ &=\sum_{{m=0}\atop{m\equiv N(\bmod k)}}^{N}\binom{m}{\frac{N-m}{k}}(-1)^{\frac{N-m}{k}}2^{m-\frac{N-m}{k}}\\ &\qquad-\sum_{{m=0}\atop{m\equiv N(\bmod k)}}^{N-k}\binom{m}{\frac{N-m}{k}-1}(-1)^{\frac{N-m}{k}-1}2^{m-\frac{N-m}{k}+1}\\ &=\sum_{{m=0}\atop{m\equiv N(\bmod k)}}^{k-1}\binom{m}{\frac{N-m}{k}}(-1)^{\frac{N-m}{k}}2^{m-\frac{N-m}{k}}\tag{5}\\ &\qquad+\sum_{{m=k}\atop{m\equiv N(\bmod k)}}^{N-k} \left(\binom{m}{\frac{N-m}{k}}-\frac{1}{2^k}\binom{m-k}{\frac{N-m}{k}}\right)(-1)^{\frac{N-m}{k}}2^{m-\frac{N-m}{k}}\\ \end{align*}

Comment:

  • In (3) we use the linearity of the coefficient of operator and $[s^N]s^mf(s)=[s^{N-m}]f(s)$

  • In (4) we change the limit of the left hand sum from $\infty$ to $N$ according to the maximum coefficient $[s^N]$. According to the factors $s^{kj}$ we consider in the following only summands with $m\equiv N(\bmod k)$

  • In (5) we reorganise the sums from the line above by extracting from the left hand sum the first summand and shifting in the right hand side the index by one and putting both sums together.

We conclude: An explicit representation of the probability $P(N,k)$ $(n\geq 0)$ is according to (5) \begin{align*} P(N,k)&=1-\sum_{{m=0}\atop{m\equiv N(\bmod k)}}^{k-1}\binom{m}{\frac{N-m}{k}}(-1)^{\frac{N-m}{k}}2^{-\frac{(k+1)(N-m)}{k}}\\ &\qquad-\sum_{{m=k}\atop{m\equiv N(\bmod k)}}^{N-k} \left(\binom{m}{\frac{N-m}{k}}-\frac{1}{2^k}\binom{m-k}{\frac{N-m}{k}}\right)(-1)^{\frac{N-m}{k}}2^{-\frac{(k+1)(N-m)}{k}} \end{align*}

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.