Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is an excercise in the book Algebraic Topology - Greenberg and Harper

Excercise : Let $f$ and $g$ be a map from $S^n$ to $S^n$ such that $f(x)\neq g(x)$ for all $x$

Then $f $ is homotopic to $ag$ where $a$ is antipodal map, hence deg($f)=(-1)^{n+1} $deg($g$).

Here, deg($f$) is a map from $H_n(S^n; {\bf Z})$ to $H_n(S^n; {\bf Z})$ induced from $f$

Question : If $n=2$, and if $f$ and $g$ are rotations with different axes, then $f(x)\neq g(x)$ for all $x$. So deg($f)=$deg($g$)$=1$ and deg$(a) =-1$. So is the exercise right ?

share|improve this question
Any two rotations of $S^2$ with different axes will compose to another rotation (with a... different different axis). So there'll be two antipodal points $x_1, x_2$ with $f(x_i)=g(x_i)$. –  Micah Nov 9 '12 at 23:55
Indeed -- there's a nice formula for the axis of rotation of the product of two rotations of $S^2$. It's given by a formula that uses quaternionic multiplication. –  Ryan Budney Nov 10 '12 at 0:01

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Your claim (in your question) is wrong.

Take $f:S^2\to S^2$ to be $\pi$-rotation about z-axis, and take $g:S^2\to S^2$ to be $\pi$-rotation about y-axis. Then the point $x=(1,0,0)$ is mapped to its antipode $(-1,0,0)$ via both $f$ and $g$, i.e. moving in two possible directions ("over" and "sideways").

share|improve this answer

I remember having this same misconception when first taking algebraic topology. Your statement about rotations with different axes is the tricky point. In fact, $f$ and $g$ will agree for some $x$. (Actually, for two antipodal points $x$ and $-x.$) As far as I can tell, Euler was the first one to figure this out; he proved that the composition of two rotations of the sphere is a rotation.

As an example, consider the point $P=(1,0,0)$ on the equator of the unit sphere. Consider the rotation $f$ around the north pole by $180^\circ$. This maps $P$ $180^\circ$ along the equator to $f(P)=(-1,0,0)$. Then consider the rotation $g$ around the point $(0,1,0)$ by $180^\circ$. You can check that this also maps $(1,0,0)$ to $(-1,0,0)$. ($180^\circ$ along a line of longitude this time.) You can easily use a similar method to find examples that don't use $180^\circ$ rotations if you find this example unconvincing.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.