Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Okay, so the question I am working on is, "Suppose that A is a nonempty set, and $f$ is a function that has A as its domain. Let R be the relation on A consisting of all ordered pairs $(x, y)$ such that $f(x)=f(y)$.

a)Show that R is an equivalence relation on A.

b)What are the equivalence classes of R?"

I was able to part a, but I am not certain how to answer part b. I know that the domain is the set A, but what is the range? And when you say that $f(x)=f(y)$, does that mean that a function is equal to its inverse? Like for instance, $\Large y=\frac{1}{x}$

share|improve this question
    
We are not defining $y$ in terms of $x$ via the equation $f(x)=f(y)$. Nor are we defining the function in terms of this equation. Rather, the function is already a priori given to us, and we construct the set $R$ out of it, comprised precisely of all ordered pairs $(x,y)$ for which $f(x)=f(y)$ happens to holds true. –  anon Nov 9 '12 at 23:48
    
So, when I plug in x into the functions f(x) and f(y), I should get the same output, namely, y? And that is the condition for an ordered-pair to be in the relation? –  Mack Nov 9 '12 at 23:52
    
$f$ is a function that maps elements of $A$ to some other set, and $f(x)$ is the function $f$ evaluated at $x\in A$, i.e. the output of $f$ when the input is $x$. Just as $f(y)$ is the output of $f$ when the input is $y\in A$. You seem to be thinking in a strange mixture of different viewpoints, one of them involving $x$ as input and $y$ as output (often used in, say, graphing equations), which is not what is going on here. We are saying if we take two inputs $x,y$ from the domain $A$, they are in relation to each other ($x\sim y$) if and only if they have the same output under $f$. –  anon Nov 10 '12 at 0:24
    
Could you read my comment on Peter Smith's response to my question? Because it seems that what I said was correct, even though he thought it was wrong. –  Mack Nov 10 '12 at 0:29
1  
No, f(x) and f(y) are not two different functions. We say either (a) $x\mapsto f(x)$ and $y\mapsto f(y)$ are the same function [sometimes the $\mapsto$ part is suppressed, so we say that $f(x)$ is a function, but clearly having more then one input is confusing you], or (b) neither $f(x)$ or $f(y)$ are functions, but are rather values taken in the codomain, and are in particular the outputs of f corresponding to the inputs x and y respectively. It is not correct that x=y is necessary for f(x)=f(y). (If f is a constant function, for instance, then f(x)=f(y) is true for any pair x,y.) –  anon Nov 10 '12 at 0:45

3 Answers 3

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The equivalence classes are all sets of the form $\{a\in A:f(a)=b\}$ for $b$ in the range of $f$. $f(x)=f(y)$ simply mean that $x$ and $y$ are mapped to the same element, not that the function is its inverse.

share|improve this answer
    
So, $f(x)=b=f(y)$ when $a$ is substituted into the function $f$? –  Mack Nov 10 '12 at 15:31

Let's say that $f$ discriminates $x$ from $y$ if it maps $x$ and $y$ to different objects, i.e. if $f(x) \neq f(y)$. Then the corresponding $R$ relation is defined to hold between $x$ and $y$ when $f$ doesn't discriminate them.

"When you say that $f(x)=f(y)$, does that mean that a function is equal to its inverse?" Not at all. $f$ can be any function you like here: to repeat, we are just told that the corresponding $R$-relation is defined to hold between $x$ and $y$ just when the function $f$ (whatever it is) happens to map $x$ and $y$ to the same thing, so doesn't discriminate.

So, as you say, that evidently makes $R$ (i.e. being indiscriminable-by-$f$) an equivalence relation. What are its equivalence classes? Well they must be classes such that objects are in the same class when $f$ doesn't discriminate them. It is as simple as that!

share|improve this answer
    
So, let me see if I understand. As you said, $f(x)$ and $f(y)$ do not have to be inverses of each other--one is just some function of x, and the other is just some function of y. And so, an ordered pair $(x,y)$ can only be in the relation on the set A if, when I plug x into the $f(x)$, and y into $f(y)$, the two functions have the same output value? I am still having trouble seeing how to find part b. In the answer key, they talk about inverse images. –  Mack Nov 9 '12 at 13:33
    
@EMACK: No, $f$ is the function — just $f$. $f(x)$ is the value given by applying that function to some variable named $x$, $f(y)$ is the value given by applying that same function to $y$, $f(q)$ is the value given by applying the function to $q$, $f(\aleph)$ is the value given by applying $f$ to $\aleph$, and so on. –  Ilmari Karonen Nov 9 '12 at 13:57
    
By convention, functions are often defined by an expression that gives their value for some argument $x$, such as "$f(x) = x^2 - x + 1$". This just means that, when you apply the function to some value that is not named $x$, you'll get the value of the function by replacing all occurrences of $x$ in the expression with the actual argument of the function, e.g. $f(z/2) = (z/2)^2 - z/2 + 1$. –  Ilmari Karonen Nov 9 '12 at 14:03
    
@EMACK As Ilmari Karonen is gently pointing out, you do seem to have very fundamentally misunderstood standard function notation. What to do? As always in such a case, read two or three explanations in different textbooks: with luck, reading more than one presentation will help you iron out any bad misunderstandings. –  Peter Smith Nov 9 '12 at 15:09

I will give an example:

Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ with $f(x)=x^2$.
Then $x$ is equivalent to $-x$ because $f(x)=f(-x)$.
The equivalence classes are $\bar{x} = \{y \in \mathbb{R}:f(x)=f(y)\}=\{x,-x\}$ for $x \in \mathbb{R}$. Thus the equivalence classes are $\{\bar{x}:x\geq0\}$.

Observe that $\{x,-x\}=f^{-1}\left(\{x\}\right)$. In general the equivalence classes are $\{f^{-1}\left(\{y\}\right): \ y \text{ in range of } f\}$.

share|improve this answer
    
If $f^{-1}$ doesn't exist, you can't write $f^{-1}( y )$ but you can write $f^{-1}( \{ y \} )$ which is the set of the numbers whose image by $f$ is $y$. –  xavierm02 Nov 9 '12 at 13:29
    
Correct, I will edit. –  P.. Nov 9 '12 at 13:34

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.