Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose $F$ is a field with characteristic $p$, a prime number. Prove that $F$ contains a subring identical to $Z_p$.

Are identical subrings the same? There is no mention of this in the text. So do I only have to prove that $Z_p$ is a subring of the defined field?

Then if $x,y$ are elements of $F$, then $(x+y)$ is an element of $F$. If $(x+y) < p$, then its also an element of $Z_p$. If $(x+y)=mp$, where $m$ is any natural number, then $(x+y)=0$ and is still closed under addition in $Z_p$, but couldn't $(x+y)>p$, and thus it wouldn't be closed in $Z_p$ or am I conceptualizing this wrong some how (ring theory is a really new concept).

share|cite|improve this question
Identical means isomorphic – Amr Nov 9 '12 at 1:37
I know nothing about isomorphic does one show they are isomorphic? – Carly Nov 9 '12 at 1:45
By showing that there exists a bijection that preserves the operations – Amr Nov 9 '12 at 1:47
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Consider the subring $R=${${0,1,1+1,...}$}

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.