Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know what it means formally to say that a stochastic matrix and a measure are in detailed balance. ($ \lambda_iP_{ij} = \lambda_jP_{ji} \; \forall (i,j)$) but I'm not really sure how to interpret it intuitively, can anyone helpe me?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Imagine that a heap of sand is placed at each site, with a quantity $\lambda_i$ of sand at site $i$. A bell rings. Then each grain of sand at $i$ decides to migrate to $j$ with probability $P_{ij}$, independently of all the others (that is, each individual grain of sand performs a trajectory of the Markov chain and the trajectories are independent). Detailed balance means that as much sand traveled along the edge $(ij)$ from $i$ to $j$ as from $j$ to $i$. Detailed balance implies stationarity, that is, the fact that, once every grain of sand has settled at its new location, each site $i$ has again a quantity $\lambda_i$ of sand. But detailed balance is stronger than stationarity since it means that a film of the movements of the sand looks exactly the same when viewed forwards or backwards.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.