Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Based on this question:

Is it true that $\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathbb{R}^2$ are isomorphic as abelian groups?.

I'm trying to prove that this map $\varphi:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^2$ defined by its action on element of Hamel basis of $\mathbb R$: $\varphi(e_\lambda)= (e_{i(\lambda)_1},e_{i(\lambda)_2})$, where $i:\Lambda\to\Lambda\times\Lambda$ is a set theoretic bijection, is an isomorphism between $\mathbb R$ and $\mathbb R^2$ as $\mathbb Q$-vector spaces.

The author were focusing in another aspects of the question and leave this proof unsolved. I'm trying to understand why this is an isomorphism, I have a basic knowledge of abstract algebra, I need help.

Thanks

share|improve this question
    
By the way, you should take a look at the edited verrsion of that question. Couse the first solution was wrong, though all folks said it is correct. –  Norbert Jul 8 at 16:55

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

I'm not sure what you mean by $\Lambda$, but it appears that the map $\phi$ gives a bijection between a $\bf Q$-basis of $\bf R$ and a $\bf Q$-basis of ${\bf R}^2$, right? Now you extend $\phi$ by linearity to be a map from $\bf R$ to ${\bf R}^2$. Since you have extended it by linearity, it is a linear transformation. To show it's a $\bf Q$-vector space isomorphism, you have to show it's one-one and onto; equivalently, you have to show it's invertible.

So, given an element of ${\bf R}^2$, you can express it as a finite linear combination of the basis vectors; then can you see how to use $\phi$ to show it is the image of a unique element of $\bf R$?

share|improve this answer
    
what do you mean exactly by "extend $\phi$ by linearity"? –  user42912 Nov 8 '12 at 2:52
1  
When you have a transformation $T$ defined on a basis $B$ then to extend it by linearity means this: given any $v$ in the domain, express $v$ in terms of the basis as $v=a_1b_1+\cdots+a_rb_r$ for some $b_1,\dots,b_r$ in $B$ and some scalars $a_1,\dots,a_r$, and define $T(v)=a_1T(b_1)+\cdots+a_rT(b_r)$. –  Gerry Myerson Nov 8 '12 at 2:56
    
So suppose $v=a_1b_1+\ldots+a_nb_n$, where $\{b_1,\ldots,b_n\}$ is a basis, we define $\phi$ as$\phi(v)=a_1\phi(b_1)+\ldots+a_n\phi(b_n)$? –  user42912 Nov 8 '12 at 3:06
1  
Yes. ${}{}{}{}$ –  Gerry Myerson Nov 8 '12 at 3:07
    
so I already proved that this function is one-one and onto, what's next? the question is done? –  user42912 Nov 8 '12 at 3:17

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.