Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Calculate the surface area of the following: 1) the portion of the sphere $ x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 16z $ that lies within the paraboloid $ z = x^2 + y^2 $

Attempt:so by rearranging the eqn given we have a sphere with centre coordinates $ (0,0,8) $ and radius 8. Setting the eqns equal to each other ( the eqn of the paraboloid and sphere) I get $ z + (z-8)^2 = 64 $ which $ => z=15, z = 0$. I am sort of stuck from here. I tried saying that in spherical polars, $ z=r\cos\phi$ so by putting this into the eqn $ (z) + z^2 = 16z, $ I get $ r\cos\phi + r^2\cos^2\phi = 16r\cos\phi $ but this gives an undefined angle. What did I do wrong which led to an undefined angle - any hints on how to proceed with the question?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 0 down vote accepted

Hint: the question is rotationally symmetric, so you are better off using cylindrical instead of spherical coordinates. Drawing a picture (by symmetry your picture can be just inside the $y$-$z$ plane) you see that the portion of the sphere inside the paraboloid is the portion where the $z$ coordinate is at least 15.

share|cite|improve this answer
Does there not exist a part of the sphere enclosed within the paraboloid beyond z= 15? I drew the picture and it seems to be the case? Should we use cylindrical because there is symmetry with respect to one of the axes? – CAF Nov 7 '12 at 16:20
I meant to say there exists a portion of the sphere below z=15? – CAF Nov 7 '12 at 16:45
@CAF: if you solved the quadratic equation correctly, there shouldn't be a portion of the sphere below $z = 15$. The intersection points of the sphere and the paraboloid are the boundaries of those regions. The other region is bounded above by $z = 0$, and hence is a single point. – Willie Wong Nov 8 '12 at 8:39
Here is the graph. And yes, we use cylindrical symmetry because there is symmetry with respect to the $z$ axis. – Willie Wong Nov 8 '12 at 8:43

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.