Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given is a second-order tensor $T$, and three arbitrary vectors, $u$, $v$ and $w$, defined in Euclidean point space $\mathcal{E}$.

Prove that the determinant of the tensor $T$

$\det T=\frac{Tu.(Tv \times Tw)}{u.(v \times w)}$

is independent of $u$, $v$ and $w$, as long as they form a base in the 3-dimensional vector space $\mathcal{V}$ defined on $\mathcal{E}$ (that is, vectors $u$, $v$ and $w$ are linearly independent).

This is basically proving that the determinant of a tensor is invariant of the particular basis it happens to be resolved in.

I've tried to work through this using index notation, but it got pretty cumbersome quickly, so I thought there might be another way to do it. I'm not looking for the full treatment here, but rather as a general advice how to tackle this. I think I can manage the details myself.

share|cite|improve this question

Since you use the cross and dot products in your question, you are working over an inner product space, therefore $\mathcal{V}$ is canonically identified with its dual. In particular this means that we can treat $T$, a rank-two tensor, as a linear transformation on $\mathcal{V}$. Therefore $T$ extends to a linear transformation on the exterior algebra of $\mathcal{V}$ and in particular you have a map $\tilde{T}:\Lambda^3V \to\Lambda^3V$. Using the inner-product, you can take the Hodge dual identifying $*: \Lambda^3V \to \mathbb{R}$ satisfying $** = 1$. So pre- and post-composing with $*$, you can extend $T$ to a linear map $\hat{T}:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ (which is just multiplication by a real number).

You can check that your expression is in fact

$$ \det T = \frac{*[\tilde{T}(u\wedge v \wedge w)]}{*(u\wedge v \wedge w)} = \frac{\hat{T}s}{s}$$

which is clearly independent of the chosen basis of $\mathcal{V}$.

The statement in the end reflects the fact that the determinant of a linear transformation on a vector space represents the numerical factor by which the volume element in the vector space changes under the linear transformation.

share|cite|improve this answer

Well, one should observe that $u \cdot (v \times w)$ is equal to the determinant, in an oriented orthonormal basis, of the matrix U with $u, v, w$ as its columns. So, if we assume the determinant is multiplicative, we have $Tu \cdot (Tv \times Tw) = \det TU = \det T \det U = (\det T) u \cdot (v \times w)$, which is what we wanted to prove.

Of course, perhaps the point of the question is to prove that the determinant is multiplicative. This is a little more difficult, and essentially amounts to proving certain facts about alternating multilinear forms.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.