Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question is elementary and hence might be a duplicate. From Rudin, Real and Complex Analysis, page 57.

Let $\mu$ be a regular Borel measure on a compact Hausdorff space $X$: assume $\mu(X)=1$. Prove that there is a compact set $K\subset X$ (the carrier or support of $\mu$) such that $\mu(K)=1$ but $\mu(H)<1$ for every proper compact subset $H$ of $K$.

I could not follow Rudin's hint that If $K$ is the intersection of all compact set $K_{\alpha}$ with $K_{\alpha}=1$, then every open set in $V$ contains $K$ also contains some $K_{\alpha}$. I do not know how to prove this. In the simple scenario where $X$ has only finite (or countably) many such $K_{a}$'s, $\mu(K)=1$ is apparent by De Morgan's law. However I do not know what will be wrong if there is an open set $O$ containing $K$ but not any of the $K_{i}$, since $O-K_{i}$ could have zero measure.

I also do not know how to prove in the uncountable case that $\mu(K)=1$ where De Morgan's law gives uncountable union and $\bigcup_{\alpha \in A} \mu(O_{\alpha})$ except following Rudin's suggestion. So I am stuck. Also, even if I managed to show this property, what should I do with regularity to prove $\mu(H)<1$ for every proper compact set $H$ of $K$? Again $H$ can be differed by $K$ with a compact set of measure 0.

I tried to reduce the proof by checking the case of $K,K_{1},K_{2}$, where $\mu(K)=\mu(K_{1})=\mu(K_{2})=\mu(K_{1}\bigcup K_{2})=1$. But it is not clear to me why $K_{1}/K$ cannot contain an open set of 0 measure. So I feel I am stuck on something really elementary.

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Let $\cal K$ the collection of compact sets of measure $1$; it's not empty as $X\in\cal K$. Let $K:=\bigcap_{K\in\cal K}K$: it's a compact set. Let $O$ an open set containing $K$. Assume that $C\cap O^c\neq\emptyset$ for all $C\in\cal K$. Then $\{C\cap O^c,C\in\cal K\}$ is a collection of compact subsets of $X$, with empty intersection. So $\{C^c\cup O,C\in\cal K\}$ is an open cover of the compact $X$, and we can extract a finite subcover $\{C_j^c\cup O,C_j\in\cal K, 1\leqslant j\leqslant n\}$. So $X=\bigcup_{j=1}^n(C_j^c\cup O)$ and $X=\left(\bigcap_{j=1}^nC_j\right)^c\cup O$. This gives $\bigcap_{j=1}^nC_j\subset O$. It's enough to conclude that $\mu(O)=1$, and by outer regularity that $\mu(K)=1$.

Indeed, $\mu(O)\leqslant\mu(X)\leqslant 1$, and we can show by induction that if $S_1,\dots,S_n$ are sets of measure $1$, so is their intersection (it's actually enough to do it for $n=2$).

If $H$ is a strict compact subset of $K$ and has measure $1$, then $H\in\cal K$, so $H$ would be strictly contained in $H$, a contradiction.

share|improve this answer
add comment

prove that the compact subset of R is the support of the borel measure

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.