Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

$X$ is a random variable defined in $\mathbb N$. How can I prove that for all $n\in \mathbb N$?

  • $ \text E(X) =\sum_{k=0}^n k \text{Pr}(X=k) = \sum^{n-1}_{k=0} \text{Pr}(X>k) -n \text{Pr}(X>n)$
  • $\text E(X) =\sum_{k=0}^n k \text{Pr}(X=k)=\sum_{k\ge 0} \text{Pr}(X>k) $
share|improve this question

2 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

For part $a)$, use Thomas' hint. You get $$ \sum_{i=0}^{n}k(P(X>i-1)-P(X>i)). $$

This develops as $P(X>0)-P(X>1)+2P(X>1)-2P(X>2)+3P(X>2)-3P(X>3)+\cdots nP(X>n-1)-nP(X>n)$

for part $b)$:

In general, you have

$\mathbb{E}(X)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^\infty P(X\geq i).$

You can show this as follow: $$ \sum\limits_{i=1}^\infty P(X\geq i) = \sum\limits_{i=1}^\infty \sum\limits_{j=i}^\infty P(X = j) $$

Switch the order of summation gives \begin{align} \sum\limits_{i=1}^\infty P(X\geq i)&=\sum\limits_{j=1}^\infty \sum\limits_{i=1}^j P(X = j)\\ &=\sum\limits_{j=1}^\infty j\, P(X = j)\\ &=\mathbb{E}(X) \end{align}

$$\sum\limits_{i=0}^{\infty}iP(X=i)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^\infty P(X\geq i)=\sum\limits_{i=0}^{\infty} P(X> i)$$

share|improve this answer
I was proving the wrong thing, when I saw your edit :P – Jean-Sébastien Nov 7 '12 at 2:19
Thank you very much. – OlayinkaSF Nov 7 '12 at 2:33
Hi @Jean-Sébastien, can you explain the part you switch the summation a little more? while in the first sum Pr(X = 1) appears once, in the switched one, however, Pr(x = 1) appears many times which seems not to be equal to the first one. – Sam Nov 7 '12 at 3:37
@Sepehr If you look at it carefully, it only appears once. The second summation is of index $i$, while the inside sum has not $i$, just a $j$. this is why it becomes $j\times P(X=j$) in the second line. Try writing the first two sums in a array, lines being on $j$ and column on $i$. First line sums each line while second sums each column. I'll edit if you can't get it. – Jean-Sébastien Nov 7 '12 at 13:17
Hi @Jean-Sébastien, I see what you are saying. Now I get it. Thanks. – Sam Nov 9 '12 at 18:07
show 1 more comment

Hint: $Pr(X=k) = Pr(X>k-1)-Pr(X>k)$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.