Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let X be a topological space and $C_n(X)$ be the singular chain complex. The homology is defined to be $H_n(X)$ = $ ker \partial_n / im \partial_{n+1}$.

What happens if we take $ K_n(X) = C_n(X) / im \partial_{n+1}$ instead?

(The idea comes from comparing the fundamental group to the fundamental groupoid)

share|cite|improve this question
Have you tried to compute such thing, for example? Try and see for yourself what happens. – Grigory M Nov 6 '12 at 22:04
I don't understand the downvote. The question is well-formulated and it's an interesting idea which is motivated by analogy with another, better-known interesting idea. It's certainly not a homework problem. – user29743 Nov 6 '12 at 22:07
It's not invariant under homotopy. – Qiaochu Yuan Nov 6 '12 at 23:03
Neither is the fundamental groupoid. – user29743 Nov 7 '12 at 5:41

Write $L_n(X)$ for chains mod cycles. We have a short exact sequence

$$ 0 \to H_n(X) \to K_n(X) \to L_n(X) \to 0 $$

On the other hand, $d$ induces an inclusion $$ 0 \to L_n(X) \to C_{n-1}(x), $$ i.e. $L_n$ is a submodule of a free, so is free, in fact is isomorphic to $B_{n-1}(X).$ Thus our sequence splits (though not naturally in $X$) and $$ K_n(X) = B_{n-1}(X) \oplus H_n(X). $$

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks countinghaus. Do you think there's any chance of a 'geometric' interpretation of this? I'm thinking about $H_1(X)$ in particular – Kris Joanidis Nov 6 '12 at 22:36
So, this assumes we're computing the $\Bbb{Z}$-homology, yes? – Kevin Carlson Nov 6 '12 at 23:02

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.