Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I found a better proof of the theorem in Serge Lang - Algebraic Number Theory but I put in bold the parts I don't understand. Hoping for any explanations of these points.


The trace $Tr : L \to K$ is linear and nondegenerate in the sense that there exists an $x \in L$ such that $Tr(x) \not = 0$. If $\alpha$ is a nonzero element of $L$ then $x \mapsto Tr(\alpha x)$ is an element of the dual space of $L$ (as a $K$-vector space) and it is a homomorphism from $L$ to the dual space.

Since kernel is trivial it follows that $L$ is isomorphic to it's dual under the bilinear form $(x,y) \mapsto Tr(xy)$. I don't understand this part, trivial kernel only gives injectivity. By rank-nullity I know the image of the map has the same dimension as $L$ but I would also need to know that a-priori to have surjectivity?

Let $\{w'_1,\ldots,w'_n\}$ be the dual basis of $\{w_1,\ldots,w_n\}$ satisfying $Tr(w'_i w_j) = \delta_{ij}$. I suppose the $w'_1$ are elements of $L$ which represent elements of the dual space, but I don't really understand what they are and how we can make sure the $\delta_{ij}$ condition is satisfied. Let $c \not = 0$ be an element of $A$ such that each $cw'_i$ is integral.

share|improve this question
1  
What are your definitions? And when you say orthonormal, do you mean orthonormal with respect to your bilinear form $t$? –  user27126 Nov 6 '12 at 19:10
1  
If you start with a nondegenerate bilinear form on a vector space $V$ (say finite dimensional), then this would mean that $V \to V^*$ coming from the bilinear form is an isomorphism, then the existence of dual basis is easy. –  user27126 Nov 6 '12 at 19:11
    
@Sanchez, thank you very much but I don't understand this. In my case I have a finite seperable extension $L$ of a number field $K$, a nondegenerate $t_{L/K} : L \times L \to K$ and a basis for $L/K$ (I think that's a basis for $L$ with coefficients in $K$). –  sperners lemma Nov 6 '12 at 19:16
2  
Let $V$ be a finite dimensional vector space over a field $K$, such that there is a symmetric bilinear form $t: V \times V \to K$ satisfying the induced map, $V \to V^*$ is an isomorphism. (where the map is defined by $v \to t_v$, and $t_v ( w ) = t(v,w)$. Show that if $v_1,\cdots,v_n$ is a basis of $V$, there exists a dual basis $w_1,\cdots,w_n$ of $V$, such that $t(v_i,w_j) = \delta_{ij}$. –  user27126 Nov 6 '12 at 19:19
2  
I wonder whether you, @sperner, are missing something fundamental. You understand that $L$ is a vector space over $K$ of dimension $n$, right? And you do know that $L$ and its $K$-dual have the same dimension? And you know that a homomorphism between two vector spaces of the same dimension is one-to-one if and only if it’s a surjection? –  Lubin Nov 13 '12 at 23:48

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted
+500

As commenters say, $L^* = \hom_K(L,K)$ is a vector space over $K$ of dimension $n$, the same dimension as $L$ over $K$. You have a $K$ linear map $T : L \to L^*$, such that $T(x)$ is the linear form defined by $T(x)(y) = Tr(xy)$.

Since there is a $y \in L$ such that $Tr(y) \neq 0$, $T(1)$ is not the zero map of $L^*$. Since $L$ is a field, for any $\alpha \neq 0$, multiplication by $\alpha$ is a permutation of $L$, so $T(\alpha)$ is again nonzero : $T(\alpha)(\alpha^{-1}y) = T(1)(y) \neq 0$. This implies that the map $T$ is injective, and since $L$ and $L^*$ have the same dimension, $T$ has to also be surjective : it is an isomorphism.

You have a basis $(w_1 \ldots w_n)$ of $L$ over $K$. Its dual basis is the basis $(w'_1 \ldots w'_n)$ of $L^*$ over $K$ such that $w_i'(w_j) = \delta_{i,j}$. This means that if $x \in L$, if you write $x = \sum_j c_j w_j$, then $w_i'(x) = w_i'(\sum_j c_j w_j) = \sum_j c_j \delta_{i,j} = c_i$ : the linear map $w_i'$ is simply the map "$i$-th coordinate in the basis $(w_1 \ldots w_n)$".

And indeed, the family $(w_1' \ldots w_n')$ generate $L^*$ : If $\phi \in L^*$, look at the numbers $\phi(w_i)$ and define $\psi = \phi - \sum_i \phi(w_i)w_i'$. Forall $j$, $\psi(w_j) = \phi(w_j) - \sum_i \phi(w_i)w_i'(w_j) = \phi(w_j) - \phi(w_j) = 0$, and because the $(w_j)$ generate $L$, we must have $\psi(x) = 0$ forall $x\in L$. It is simple to check that the family is free, so $L^*$ really has dimension $n$.

Now that you have an isomorphism $T : L \to L^*$, you can define $w_i^* = T^{-1}(w_i')$, which means that $w_i^*$ is the element of $L$ such that $T(w_i) = w_i'$, which means that $Tr(w_i^* w_j) = \delta_{i,j}$.

If you write $w_i^* = \sum_k c_{i,k} w_j$, this means that the numbers $c_{i,k}$ satisfy the equations $\sum_k c_{i,k} Tr(w_kw_j) = \delta_{i,j}$ for all $j$. In fact if you denote $M$ the matrix $(Tr(w_kw_j))$ and $C$ the matrix $(c_{i,k})$, these equations are merely stating that $C M = I_n$ : you find the coefficients of the $w_i^*$ (in the basis $(w_1 \ldots w_n)$) in the inverse of the matrix $M$.

Even if you are skeptical of anything having to do with $L^*$, you should still be convinced that $\det(M) \neq 0$ (and hence is invertible): for any nonzero $a = \sum_i a_i w_i \in L$, remember the element $y$ whose trace is nonzero, and let $a^{-1}y = \sum_j b_j w_j$. Now compute $(a_1 \ldots a_n)^\bot M (b_1 \ldots b_n) = \sum_{i,j}a_ib_j Tr(w_iw_j) = Tr((\sum_i a_i w_i)(\sum_j b_j w_j)) = Tr(a (a^{-1}y)) = Tr(y) \neq 0$.

If $M$ wasn't invertible, there would be an element $a \in L$ such that $(a_1 \ldots a_n)^\bot M = 0$, but this is impossible because there is a vector whose image by this is nonzero (this is a direct translation of the previous argument for the injectivity of $T$).

Also, if you change your basis, $\det(M)$ is multiplied by the square of the determinant of the change of basis matrix, so the squarefree part of $\det(M)$ is independant from the choice of basis, and is related to the discriminant of $L$ over $K$ (if you pick an integral basis, it is the discriminant), so $\det(M)$ is something important.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.