Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've started studying calculus. As part of studies I've encountered a question. How does one prove that $1 > 0$?

I tried proving it by contradiction by saying that $1 < 0$, but I can't seem to contradict this hypothesis.

Any help will be welcomed.

share|cite|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 5 down vote accepted

If $1<0$ then $-1>0$, hence $1=(-1)\cdot(-1)>0$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Why do you assume that (−1)⋅(−1)>0 ? – vondip Nov 6 '12 at 16:38
He doesn't assume it. The product of positives is positive. That's part of the definition of an ordered field. – kahen Nov 6 '12 at 16:41
I do not assume that. I assume that $1<0$. By adding $-1$ on both sides, I find $0<-1$. By multiplying with the positive(!) number $-1$ then $1>0$ follows. – Hagen von Eitzen Nov 6 '12 at 16:41
I don't know if it's called anything, but the definition goes like this: An ordered pair $(F,P)$ where $F$ is a field and $P \subset F$ satisfies (1) $0 \in P$ and (2) $x,y \in P \implies x+y \in P$ and $xy \in P$ is said to be an ordered field and $P$ is said to be the positive cone of $F$. $\quad$ It's an easy exercise to prove that if $(F,P)$ is an ordered field then $x \leq y \iff y-x \in P$ defines a total order on $F$. – kahen Nov 6 '12 at 16:45
Oh. I forgot part of the definition. You need (3) $F$ is the disjoint union of $P\setminus\{0\}$, $-P\setminus\{0\}$ and $\{0\}$. Otherwise $P$ is just a prepositive cone. – kahen Nov 7 '12 at 6:34

You can use the trivial inequality $x^2 \geq 0$ for all $x$. Prove this fact and use it to prove $1 >0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Previous answers are not complete.

Axioms of ordered set give us only $\forall x \le 0 \ y \le 0 \ \ \ \ xy \ge 0$. And we can get only $0 \le 1$.

Now we need to proof the $0 \ne 1$.

$x = x \cdot 1 = x \cdot (1 + 0) = x \cdot 1 + x \cdot 0 \rightarrow x \cdot 0 = 0$

Suppose that $0 = 1$. By the axiom $\forall x \in \mathbb{F} \ \ \ \ x \cdot 1 = x $. But $x \cdot 0 = 0$ by above. Contradiction.

$0 \ne 1 \\ 0 < 1$


share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.