Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $f: \mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^n$, where $f(tx)=tf(x)$, for all $x \in \mathbb{R}^m$ and $t \in \mathbb{R}$. Show that $f$ is a linear transformation.

share|improve this question
7  
What have you tried? Do you know the definition of a linear transformation? Also, are you sure that this is the full question? –  KReiser Nov 5 '12 at 15:58
    
Please do not post unnecessary comments! thank you –  Jarbas Dantas Silva Nov 5 '12 at 16:03
    
I think you will find that KReiser is actually trying to be helpful, here. If we know what you have tried we have a better chance of being able to help. It is also important that we know what definition of linear you are using, as there is a chance that the result you are trying to prove is not actually true! –  Old John Nov 5 '12 at 16:06
7  
I think that the result it's not true , unless $m=1$. I think that $ f:\Bbb R^2 \to \Bbb R $ that $ f(te_1)=t$ for $t\in \Bbb R $ and $f(x)=0$ otherwise, it's well defined. And it's a counterexample –  Daniel Nov 5 '12 at 16:12
1  
Is there a (homework or whatever) exercise you want to solve? In that case you should put the whole exercise here. –  Berci Nov 5 '12 at 17:23

2 Answers 2

What you have provided is not enough to show that $ f $ is a linear transformation. It shows that $ f $ preserves scalar multiplication but does not show that $ f $ preserves addition. These two properties are independent of each other.

A non-trivial example is as follows. For each ray $ \ell $ through the origin in $ \mathbb{R}^{n} $, choose a scalar $ \alpha_{\ell} \in \mathbb{R} $. Then define $ f: \mathbb{R}^{n} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n} $ as follows: $$ \forall \mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^{n}: \quad \mathbf{x} \in \ell \quad \Longrightarrow \quad f(\mathbf{x}) \stackrel{\text{def}}{=} \alpha_{\ell} \cdot \mathbf{x}. $$ It is seen that $ f $ scales each ray passing through the origin in a manner that depends only on the ray. Hence, by choosing the $ \alpha_{\ell} $'s carefully, one can make $ f $ non-linear.

Here is how we can do it. Pick $ \mathbf{x},\mathbf{y} \in \mathbb{R}_{n} \setminus \{ \mathbf{0} \} $ such that $ \mathbf{x} \notin \text{Span}(\{ \mathbf{y} \}) $. Let $ \ell(\mathbf{x}) $ and $ \ell(\mathbf{y}) $ be the unique rays passing through $ \mathbf{x} $ and $ \mathbf{y} $ respectively and also the origin. Clearly, $ \ell(\mathbf{x}) \neq \ell(\mathbf{y}) $. Set $ \alpha_{\ell(\mathbf{x})} = \alpha_{\ell(\mathbf{y})} = 1 $. Observe that $ \mathbf{x} + \mathbf{y} \neq \mathbf{0} $ and that $ \mathbf{x} + \mathbf{y} $ belongs to a unique ray $ \ell(\mathbf{x} + \mathbf{y}) $ passing through the origin that is identical to neither $ \ell(\mathbf{x}) $ nor $ \ell(\mathbf{y}) $. Now, if $ f $ were linear, we would expect to have \begin{align} f(\mathbf{x} + \mathbf{y}) &= f(\mathbf{x}) + f(\mathbf{y}) \\ &= \alpha_{\ell(\mathbf{x})} \cdot \mathbf{x} + \alpha_{\ell(\mathbf{y})} \cdot \mathbf{y} \\ &= 1 \cdot \mathbf{x} + 1 \cdot \mathbf{y} \\ &= \mathbf{x} + \mathbf{y} \\ &\neq \mathbf{0}. \end{align} However, as $ \ell(\mathbf{x} + \mathbf{y}) \neq \ell(\mathbf{x}),\ell(\mathbf{y}) $, we are free to choose $ \alpha_{\ell(\mathbf{x} + \mathbf{y})} = 0 $, which yields $ f(\mathbf{x} + \mathbf{y}) = \mathbf{0} $ instead. Therefore, $ f $ cannot be linear.

share|improve this answer

The correct definition is as follows:

Def: $f$ is linear if, as you write, $f(tx)=tf(x)$ for all vector $x$ and scalar $t$,

and $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all vectors $x,y$.

Your question as you stated is not true for $m>1$ (basically because it misses a part of the definition), and a counterexample is given in the comments by Daniel. Please show concrete example in $\Bbb R^2$ for $x,y$ such that $f(x+y)\ne f(x)+f(y)$ for that particular $f$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.