Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $(X,\mathcal{O}_X)$ be a separated scheme and of finite type over an algebraically closed field $k$. The fact that $X$ is separated means that the image of $X$ under the diagonal morphism $\Delta: X \rightarrow X \times_{Spec(k)} X$ is closed. 1) Do i have this correct? 2) Why is this so important, i.e. $\Delta(X)$ being closed in $X \times_{Spec(k)} X$ (i am looking for just some high level intuition)? Next, i am trying to understand what "finite type over $k$" really means. Applying Hartshorne's definition, i seem to get something like that: consider the underlying continuous map of topological spaces $f:X \rightarrow Spec(k)$. Then $f^{-1}(Spec(k))$ can be covered by a finite number of open affine sets $Spec(A_i)$, where each $A_i$ is a finitely generated $k$-algebra. But since $Spec(k)$ is a one element set, we must have that $f^{-1}(Spec(k))=X$ and so finite type over $k$ is equivalent to saying that $X$ can be covered by a finite number of open affine sets $Spec(A_i)$ with $A_i$ being a finitely generated $k$-algebra. Am i understanding the situation correctly?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

As you note, finite type means that $X$ is the union of finitely opens each of which is the Spec of a finite type $k$-algebra. This is an abstraction of a basic finiteness property of quasi-projective varieties.

Separatedness is the analogue, for the Zariski topology, of being Hausdorff, and like Hausdorfness, it often plays a basic role in arguments. As one example, if $f:X \to Y$ is a morphism of $k$-schemes and $Y$ is separated, then the graph $\Gamma_f \hookrightarrow X \times Y$ will be a closed subscheme.

share|cite|improve this answer

If $X$ is a scheme of finite type over an algebraically closed field $k$ then one can show that for any affine open set Spec$A$ we have $A$ is a finitely generated $k$ algebra. Also all the restriction maps are $k$ linear.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.