Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

$$A=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}1&2&3\\4&5&6\\7&8&9\end{array}\right)$$

I don't know how to start. Will be grateful for a clue.

Edit: Matrix ranks and Det have not yet been presented in the material.

share|improve this question
    
What do you know about matrices so far? And from what perspective? What do you understand a matrix to be (an array of numbers satisfying some properties, the expression of a linear mapping of space)? –  Mark Bennet Nov 5 '12 at 12:20
1  
Perhaps you learned how to do Gaussian reduction to determine whether a matrix is invertible? Maybe called "echelon form" or something? Mark is right ... we don't know what you have done so far. So ... as the instructor for help! –  GEdgar Nov 5 '12 at 14:54
add comment

6 Answers 6

up vote 18 down vote accepted

If you really have to do this with only elementary tools, you can set up the equation $$\pmatrix{1 & 2 & 3 \cr 4 & 5 & 6 \cr 7 & 8 & 9}\pmatrix{a & b & c \cr d & e & f \cr g & h & i}=\pmatrix{1 & 0 & 0 \cr 0 & 1 & 0 \cr 0 & 0 & 1}$$ This gives you $9$ equations, but they can be divided nicely into groups of three by considering each column separately. For instance, we get $$a+2d+3g=1$$ $$4a+5d+6g=0$$ $$7a+8d+9g=0$$ This system is easily shown to be inconsistent, for example by subtracting the second equation from the third equation, and by subtracting the first equation from the second equation. You will then obtain the two equations $$3a+3d+3g=0$$ $$3a+3d+3g=-1$$ which cannot be true at the same time.

(This argument is really the same as the one given by lhf.)

share|improve this answer
add comment

Notice that $$A=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}1&2&3\\4&5&6\\7&8&9\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}1\\-2\\1\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\0\\0\end{array}\right)$$ So, if $A$ were invertible, this would imply $$\left(\begin{array}{c}1\\-2\\1\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\0\\0\end{array}\right).$$ This is again a variation on Ihf's answer.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Note that $L_3-L_2=L_2-L_1$. What does that imply about the rank of $A$?

share|improve this answer
add comment

Best way to check for inverse existence would be to calculate the Determinant. If it's non zero inverse will exist.

share|improve this answer
    
I suspect that this may be more advance than what the OP may know at this stage –  Belgi Nov 5 '12 at 11:49
    
@Belgi I think the determinant of a matrix is one of the first thing one learns before its invertibility. –  user31280 Nov 5 '12 at 12:49
3  
@F'OlaYinka I checked about ten textbooks in linear algebra, and most of them (all but two rather old books) covered inverse matrices before determinants. It's really the natural order, as the main motivation for introducing determinants is to tell whether the matrix is invertible or not. –  Per Manne Nov 5 '12 at 14:12
    
The only argument which seems to be sensible in a case where determinant is not known (understood) is showing that two rows/ columns are linearly dependent. –  Aseem Dua Nov 5 '12 at 14:44
add comment

Hint: What is the rank of $A$ ? what does this tells you ?

share|improve this answer
add comment

Row operations or column operationas don't change the rank of the matrix. So it is invertible iff anything row/column equivalent to it is invertible.

Subtract 1 times the second column from the third, 1 times the first column from the second column; this gives $$\begin{pmatrix} 1&1&1\\ 4&1&1 \\7&1&1\end{pmatrix}.$$ This is clearly singular since two columns are equal.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.