Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given $f$ is Rimann integrable on $[a,b]$, and $f(x)$ is positive at $\forall x \in [a,b]$. Using Heine-Borel's finite covering theorem to prove $\int_a^b f(x) \,\mathrm{d} x>0$.

share|cite|improve this question
Consider $\inf _ {x \in [a, b]} f (x)$. Also, put some effort into your questions. – Karolis Juodelė Nov 4 '12 at 16:28
Consider the Riemann function $f(x)=1/q$, when $x=p/q$; and $f(x)=0$ when $x$ isn't a quotient number. We could find that $g(x)=f(x)+\epsilon$ is Riemann integrable on $[0,1]$ and $\inf_{x\in[a,b]} f(x)=0$, while $f(x)>0$ on $[0,1]$. So, I just don't know what @Karolis Juodelė want to say! – sdfjldh Nov 5 '12 at 1:24

I have a proof using Closed interval theorem:

Because $\int_a^b f$ is exists, the upper sum $$\sum M_i\Delta x_i \to \int_a^b f$$ when $\lambda=\max_i\Delta x_i\to0$. If the $\int_a^b f =0$ we have an interval $[a_1,b_1]:=[x_{j},x_{j+1}]$, on it $$\sup_{x\in[a_1,b_1]} f(x)=M_i<1.$$

Due to the $f$ is still integrable on $[x_j,x_{j+1}]$ we could find the second interval $[a_2,b_2]\subsetneqq[a_1,b_1]$, for which $$\sup_{x\in[a_2,b_2]}f(x)<1/2.$$

By induction we have $[a_n,b_n]_{n\in\mathbb N}$ satisfied:

  1. $[a_n,b_n]\subsetneqq[a_{n+1},b_{n+1}]$;
  2. $\sup_{x\in[a_n,b_n]}<1/n$;
  3. $b_n-a_n\to0$.

So $\lim b_n=\lim a_n=x_0$, and $f(x_0)=0$, it's a contradiction!

But, how to prove the proposition by finite covering theorem?

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.