Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is my argument correct, if not what is wrong with it. If the group $G$ is not cyclic, this means that there is not element of order 3. So if $G=\{e, a, b\}$ then $|a|=2$ and $|b|=2$, a contradiction because by Lagrange's Theorem element order divide group order but 2 does not divide 3. Hence $G$ is cyclic.

I just want to show if this is correct or not and why, I do not need a proof.

share|cite|improve this question
1  
Yep, correct as written. – DonAntonio Nov 4 '12 at 13:36
    
@DonAntonio Thanks. – Reader Nov 4 '12 at 13:41
1  
@Reader, have you had Cauchy's Theorem?: the order of an element must divide the order of the group. So if the group has order 3, then there must be an element of order 3 and hence powers of this element fill the whole group. – Nicky Hekster Nov 4 '12 at 15:15
    
@ Nicky Hekster Thanks. – Reader Nov 4 '12 at 15:30
1  
The most elementary method is to use Sudoku! The products $ab$ and $ba$ must be equal to $e$ (using cancellation law). By default $a^2=b$. Therefore $a^3=a^2 a =ba=e$. – PAD Nov 4 '12 at 19:10

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.