Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Geometry: Auxiliary Lines

As shown in the figure: enter image description here

share|improve this question
1  
The question seems so simple, but I can't do it. – ᴊ ᴀ s ᴏ ɴ Nov 4 '12 at 6:51
Almost the same as your previous question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/228534/… – Joel Reyes Noche Nov 4 '12 at 11:05

3 Answers

up vote 1 down vote accepted

This is not the desired method, but it does show that $50^\circ$ is the result.

Call the fourth point D, and suppose A is at $(0,0)$ and C is at $(1,0)$. Then B is at $(x_B,y_B)=\left(\frac{\tan(70^\circ)}{\tan(58^\circ)+\tan(70^\circ)},\frac{\tan(58^\circ)\tan(70^\circ)}{\tan(58^\circ)+\tan(70^\circ)}\right) \approx (0.631921861,1.011286374)$ while D is at $(x_D,y_D)=\left(\frac{\tan(62^\circ)}{\tan(12^\circ)+\tan(62^\circ)},\frac{\tan(12^\circ)\tan(62^\circ)}{\tan(12^\circ)+\tan(62^\circ)}\right) \approx (0.898457801,0.190973101)$.

Then the length of AD is $a=\sqrt{x_D^2+y_D^2} \approx 0.918529883$ and of BD is $b = \sqrt{(x_D-x_B)^2+(y_D-y_C)^2} \approx 0.862528419$. Using the sine rule, the angle ABD is $$\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{a}{b}\sin(46^\circ)\right) = 50^\circ$$ at least to the precision of my calculations.

For what it is worth, an accurate diagram looks like

enter image description here

share|improve this answer

Let central point is $O$.

$\angle OBC = 180^\circ - (46^\circ+12^\circ) - (62^\circ+8^\circ) - X = 52^\circ-X$.

Using the sine formula, we have: $$\frac{AO}{\sin 62^\circ} = \frac{CO}{\sin 12^\circ},$$ $$\frac{AO}{\sin X} = \frac{BO}{\sin 46^\circ},$$ $$\frac{CO}{\sin (52^\circ-X)} = \frac{BO}{\sin 8^\circ},$$ so, $$\sin 12^\circ \cdot \sin 8^\circ \cdot \sin X = \sin 62^\circ \cdot \sin 46^\circ \cdot \sin (52^\circ-X).$$

(Here we can find that $X=50^\circ$. Uniqueness of solution is discussed in comments).


In fact we need to prove that $$\sin 8^\circ \cdot \sin 12^\circ \cdot \sin 50^\circ =^{???} \sin 2^\circ \cdot \sin 46^\circ \cdot \sin 62^\circ.$$ Using formulas $$2\cdot \sin\alpha \cdot \sin\beta = \cos(\alpha-\beta) - \cos(\alpha+\beta),$$ $$2\cdot \sin\alpha \cdot \cos\beta = \sin(\alpha-\beta) + \sin(\alpha+\beta),$$ $$\sin(180^\circ-\varphi) = \sin(\varphi), \quad \cos(180^\circ-\varphi) = -\cos(\varphi),$$

we have $$\sin 8^\circ \cdot (\cos 38^\circ - \cos 62^\circ) =^{???} \sin 2^\circ \cdot (\cos 16^\circ + \cos 72^\circ),$$ $$-\sin 30^\circ + \sin 46^\circ + \sin 54^\circ - \sin 70^\circ =^{???} -\sin 14^\circ + \sin 18^\circ - \sin 70^\circ + \sin 74^\circ,$$ $$-\sin 30^\circ + \sin 46^\circ + \sin 54^\circ + \sin 14^\circ - \sin 18^\circ - \sin 74^\circ =^{???} 0,$$ $$(\sin 14^\circ + \sin 46^\circ - \sin 74^\circ) + ( - \sin 18^\circ + \sin 54^\circ -\frac{1}{2} )=^{???} 0,$$ $$(\sin 14^\circ + \sin 134^\circ + \sin 254^\circ) + \frac{1}{2}( - \sin 18^\circ + \sin 54^\circ +\sin 126^\circ + \sin 198^\circ + \sin270^\circ )=^{???} 0,$$ it is equality, because left side is equal to $$\mathrm{Im} \left( p(\omega_3^0 + \omega_3^1 + \omega_3^2) + \frac{q}{2}( \omega_5^0 + \omega_5^1 +\omega_5^2 + \omega_5^3 + \omega_5^4) \right)=$$ $$\mathrm{Im} \left( p \cdot \frac{\omega_3^3-1}{\omega_3-1} + \frac{q}{2}\cdot \frac{\omega_5^5-1}{\omega_5-1} \right)= \mathrm{Im} \left( p \cdot \frac{1-1}{\omega_3-1} + \frac{q}{2}\cdot \frac{1-1}{\omega_5-1} \right)= \mathrm{Im} \left( p \cdot 0 + \frac{q}{2} \cdot 0 \right)= 0,$$ where $p = \exp(i\pi 7/90)$, $q = \exp(-i\pi /10)$, $w_{...}$ $-$ roots of unity:

$w_3 = \exp(i 2 \pi / 3) = \cos 2\pi/3 + i \sin 2\pi/3 = \cos 120^\circ + i \sin 120^\circ$,

$w_5 = \exp(i 2 \pi / 5) = \cos 2\pi/5 + i \sin 2\pi/5 = \cos 72^\circ + i \sin 72^\circ$.

share|improve this answer
2  
How do you find that $X=50$? – wj32 Nov 4 '12 at 10:55
Here I need to prove that $\sin 12^\circ \cdot \sin 8^\circ \cdot \sin 50^\circ = \sin 62^\circ \cdot \sin 46^\circ \cdot \sin 2^\circ$. I will think about it... Not trivial... – Oleg567 Nov 5 '12 at 16:16
@wj32: since (for postive angles less than rightangles) $\sin(x)$ is a function increasing monotonically from $0$ to $1$, there is a unique solution. And $50^\circ$ works. – Henry Nov 7 '12 at 11:22
@Henry: Well that's part of what I'm asking - how do you prove that $50^\circ$ works? – wj32 Nov 7 '12 at 11:24
@wj32: I updated proof of $50^\circ$ (look above) now. – Oleg567 Nov 7 '12 at 11:40
show 1 more comment

Edit: Typically, we'll use the fact that the sum of the angles in any triangle is $180^\circ$, and the sum of the angles about the middle vertex is $360^\circ$.

In this case, though, that isn't enough to get the answer on its own.

Second Edit: Henry's comment (specifically, the phrase "given $A$ and $B$") gave me the idea that should get us (at least most of the way) there. Let's call the unlabeled vertex $M$. By $AB$, I denote the length of the segment from $A$ to $B$, and similar for $BC$, $AC$, $AM$, $BM$, $CM$.

Note that $\angle ABC$ has measure $52^\circ$ by the $180^\circ$ rule. Thus, by Law of Sines applied to triangle $ABC$, $$\frac{AB}{\sin 70^\circ}=\frac{AC}{\sin 52^\circ},$$ so $$AC=\frac{\sin 52^\circ}{\sin 70^\circ}AB.$$ Applying Law of Sines to triangle $ACM$ gives us $$\frac{AM}{\sin 62^\circ}=\frac{AC}{\sin 106^\circ},$$ so $$AM=\frac{\sin 62^\circ}{\sin 106^\circ}AC=\frac{\sin 62\sin 52}{\sin 106^\circ\sin 70}AB.$$

Now, by the $360^\circ$ rule, $\angle AMB$ has measure $134^\circ-X$, so applying the Law of Sines (and the previous work) to triangle $ABM$ gives us $$\frac{AB}{\sin(134^\circ-X)}=\frac{AM}{\sin X}=\frac{\sin 62^\circ\sin 52^\circ}{\sin X\sin 106^\circ\sin 70^\circ}AB,$$ and so $$\sin X\sin 106^\circ\sin 70^\circ=\sin(134^\circ-X)\sin 62^\circ\sin 52^\circ.$$ Now, observe that $\sin\theta=\sin(180^\circ-\theta)$ for any angle $\theta$. This allows us to rewrite the above as $$\sin X\sin 74^\circ\sin 70^\circ=\sin(X-46^\circ)\sin 62^\circ\sin 52^\circ.$$ Having just looked at the clock, I'm going to get some sleep. I'll think on it more later today, and see if I can figure out how to get the rest of the way from here.

share|improve this answer
Unfortunately both methods seem to give you the same equation in two unknowns (unless I'm thinking of something different). – EuYu Nov 4 '12 at 6:04
Hmmm.... You're right. – Cameron Buie Nov 4 '12 at 6:23
No - there is a single solution: given A and B, there is a single position for C (up to reflection) and for the fourth point. – Henry Nov 4 '12 at 10:15
@Henry: Are you perhaps suggesting a Law of Sines approach, starting by treating $AB$ as some constant length? – Cameron Buie Nov 4 '12 at 10:29
For some reason, I was under the impression that you could always solve these kinds of questions using angle sum methods. What is the key difference with this question? – wj32 Nov 4 '12 at 10:39

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.