Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $(R,\mathfrak m,k)$ be a local ring of depth $d$ and $u:F_1\rightarrow F_0$ a homomorphism of finite free modules such that $\operatorname{Im}u\subset \mathfrak mF_0$. Then this map induces the zero map $$\mathrm{Ext}^d(k,F_1)\rightarrow\mathrm{Ext}^d(k,F_0).$$ Could you explain me why?

share|cite|improve this question

Take a regular sequence of length $d$ in the maximal ideal $\mathfrak m$. Then $\mathrm{Ext}^d_k(k,F_0)\cong\mathrm{Hom}_{\bar{R}}(k,\bar{F}_0)$, where the bar denotes the quotient module by the regular sequence. But $$\mathrm{Hom}_{\bar{R}}(k,\bar{F}_0)=(0:\mathfrak m)_{\bar{F}_0},$$ so the map $u$ induces a map of socles $(0:\mathfrak m)_{\bar{F}_1}\rightarrow (0:\mathfrak m)_{\bar{F}_0}$, but since the map $u$ is minimal, the matrix associated to $u$ has all entries in $\mathfrak m$, and so the induced map on the socles is zero.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.