Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

How do we show that $A^{\dagger^{\dagger}} = A $ without assuming $A$ to be a explicit matrix. That is, given a linear operator $A$, let us define $A^\dagger$ to be a unique operator such that $\langle A^\dagger u \mid v \rangle = \langle u\mid A v \rangle $ (standard inner product in Hilbert space) for any vectors $u$ and $v$. How can we prove that using this definition alone.

share|cite|improve this question
Can someone explain "$\dagger$" to me? – ᴊ ᴀ s ᴏ ɴ Nov 3 '12 at 9:20
@jasoncube, see conjugate transpose and Hermitian adjoint. – Rahul Nov 5 '12 at 5:03
$A^*$ is a good notation to represent the adjoint of $A$. Because, in linear algebra $A^\dagger$ is used for moore-penrose inverse generally. – gloom Nov 25 '15 at 5:25
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Per the definition, $A^{\dagger\dagger}$ is the unique linear operator such that $$\langle A^{\dagger\dagger}u\mid v\rangle = \langle u\mid A^\dagger v\rangle = \overline{\langle A^\dagger v\mid u\rangle} = \overline{\langle v\mid Au\rangle} = \overline{\overline{\langle Au\mid v\rangle}} = \langle Au\mid v\rangle$$ for all vectors $u$ and $v$, so...

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.