Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Could you please give me some hints on (Exercise 1.7.21) of "A Course in Metric Geometry" by Burago, Burago, Ivanov.

We have a compact space $X$, which can be written as $X=\bigcup_{i=1}^n X_i$ (disjoint union), where $X_i=F_i(X)$ and $F_i$ are dilations with Lipschitz constant $c_i$. Then show that the Hausdorff dimension $d$ of $X$ satisfies $\sum_{i=1}^n c_i^d = 1$.

Let $\mu_d$ denote the $d$-dimensional Hausdorff measure, then thats how far I got:

Thanks to the corrections below I am able to show it in the case where $0<\mu_d(X)<\infty$ but I still do not know how to approach the two boundary cases. Any hints are appreciated! Thanks!

share|cite|improve this question
This is obviously wrong. Consider $X=[0,1]$, $X_1=X$, $F_1(x)=x^2$. Then the minimal Lipschitz constant is $c_1=2$. Since $d=1$ for the one-dimensional line, the claim of the problem statement is $2^1=1$. – Hagen von Eitzen Nov 2 '12 at 22:50
I just read the linked original problem. It speaks of dilations, not of Lipschitz continuous functions. – Hagen von Eitzen Nov 2 '12 at 22:51
Ah, sorry. I didn't find this notion in the sections before so I just thought it meant Lipschitz continuous. I think it makes more sense now! Thank you! – zerhan Nov 2 '12 at 22:58
This is still wrong, unless you at least assume that the $X_i$ are disjoint. Otherwise you could just take all $F_i$ to be the identity. Also, what is $\mu_d$, and how do you know that $\mu_d(X)<\infty$? – Lukas Geyer Nov 2 '12 at 23:59

It helps to consider the Hausdorff content $\mathcal H^t_\infty$, which is defined like Hausdorff measure but without the requirement of covering by small sets. The content is subadditive and scales by $c^t$. It is equal to zero if and only if the $\mathcal H^t$ measure is equal to zero. And most helpfully for us, $\mathcal H^t_\infty$ is finite for every bounded set.

Therefore, $\mathcal H^t(X)\le \sum_{i}c_i^t \mathcal H^t(X) $. If $\sum_i c_i^t<1$, this implies that the content is zero, hence the measure is zero. We conclude that $\operatorname{dim}X\le d$ where $d$ is defined by $\sum_i c_i^d=1$.

For the opposite direction we need an additional assumption: $X$ is nonempty. :) Pick a point $a\in X$ and place a unit Dirac measure there: $\mu_0=\delta_a$. Then define $\mu_n$ inductively by pushing $\mu_{n-1}$ by the dilations and scaling it by $c_i^d$. Let $\mu$ be a weak* limit of these probability measures; since we are on a compact set, $\mu$ is also a probability measure. There is a constant $C$ such that $\mu(B(x,r))\le Cr^d$ for any ball $B(x,r)$ in $X$. (I am happy to leave the verification to you). It follows that for any cover of $X$ by balls $B(x_j,r_j$ we have $\sum_j r_j^d \ge C^{-1}\sum \mu(B(x_j,r_j))\ge C^{-1}$. This shows $\mathcal H^d(X)>0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.