Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can we express $\sin 1^\circ$ in a real closed, not repetitive radical forms? Any radical forms mean you can use any roots but without constants $\pi$, $e$ or other trigonometry functions.

share|cite|improve this question
Related question. I gave a radical expression for $\sin 1^\circ$ in my answer there. – J. M. Apr 9 '13 at 3:10
up vote 20 down vote accepted

In principle, yes.

This paper gives a value for $\sin 3^{\circ}$: $$\sin 3^{\circ} = \frac{1}{4} \sqrt{8-\sqrt{3}-\sqrt{15}-\sqrt{10-2\sqrt{5}}} \, .$$

Moreover, we have the triple-angle identity for $\sin$, which I will suggestively write as: $$ 4 \sin^3 \theta-3 \sin \theta + \sin 3\theta=0 \, . $$

Combining these, you can see that $x=\sin 1^{\circ}$ is a root of the cubic polynomial $$ 4x^3-3x+ \frac{1}{4} \sqrt{8-\sqrt{3}-\sqrt{15}-\sqrt{10-2\sqrt{5}}} = 0\, . $$

You could then use the cubic formula to find a closed-form expression of $\sin 1^\circ$ that uses only radicals.

Two caveats:

  • When you use the cubic formula on a polynomial with three real roots, the radical expression you get must always involve complex numbers. This will be the case here, since $\sin 121^\circ$ and $\sin 241^\circ$ must also be roots of the same polynomial. So if you want to express $\sin 1^\circ$ in terms of radicals using only real numbers, you're out of luck.
  • The expression you get will be so horrifically complicated as to be totally useless for any practical or computational purpose.
share|cite|improve this answer
In my understanding only two are complex conjugates. – kiss my armpit Nov 2 '12 at 15:34

FWIW, the minimal polynomial of $\sin(\pi/180)$ over the rationals is $$ 281474976710656\,{z}^{48}-3377699720527872\,{z}^{46}+18999560927969280 \,{z}^{44}-66568831992070144\,{z}^{42}+162828875980603392\,{z}^{40}- 295364007592722432\,{z}^{38}+411985976135516160\,{z}^{36}- 452180272956309504\,{z}^{34}+396366279591591936\,{z}^{32}- 280058255978266624\,{z}^{30}+160303703377575936\,{z}^{28}- 74448984852135936\,{z}^{26}+28011510450094080\,{z}^{24}- 8500299631165440\,{z}^{22}+2064791072931840\,{z}^{20}-397107008634880 \,{z}^{18}+59570604933120\,{z}^{16}-6832518856704\,{z}^{14}+ 583456329728\,{z}^{12}-35782471680\,{z}^{10}+1497954816\,{z}^{8}- 39625728\,{z}^{6}+579456\,{z}^{4}-3456\,{z}^{2}+1 $$

EDIT: the explicit expression obtained from Micah's cubic is not all that bad: $$ \frac{-1-\sqrt{3}i}{4} v^{1/3} + \frac{-1+\sqrt{3}i}{4} v^{-1/3} $$ where $$v=-\frac{1}{4}\sqrt {8-\sqrt {3}-\sqrt {15}-\sqrt {10-2\,\sqrt {5}}}+\frac{i}{4} \sqrt {8+\sqrt {3}+\sqrt {15}+\sqrt {10-2\,\sqrt {5}}} $$

share|cite|improve this answer

If we're allowed to use complex numbers, then sure. Note that $\sin(1 ^\circ)=\sin(\pi/180)=\frac{e^{i \pi / 180} - e^{-i \pi/180}}{2i}$. We can express $e^{i \pi/180} = (-1)^{1/180}$ and $e^{-i \pi/180} = -(-1)^{179/180}$. So the result is $\sin(1^\circ) = -\frac{1}{2} (-1)^{1/2}((-1)^{1/180}+(-1)^{179/180})$

share|cite|improve this answer

Since $(-1)^{89/180}=\cos(89^\circ)+i\sin(89^\circ)$, we get $$ \sin(1^\circ)=\cos(89^\circ)=\frac12\left((-1)^{89/180}+(-1)^{-89/180}\right)\tag{1} $$ However, I think more in keeping with the spirit of the question, if we start with $\sin(6^\circ)=\frac{\sqrt{30-6\sqrt{5}}-\sqrt{5}-1}8$ and apply $$ \sin\left(\frac x2\right)=\sqrt{\frac{1-\sqrt{1-\sin^2(x)}}2}\tag{2} $$ and $$ \sin\left(\frac x3\right)=\frac{\sqrt[\Large3]{-\sin(x)+\sqrt{\sin^2(x)-1}}+\sqrt[\Large3]{-\sin(x)-\sqrt{\sin^2(x)-1}}}2\tag{3} $$ we get $\sin(1^\circ)$. Of course, we still get into the realm of complex numbers when applying $(3)$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Well you can construct a regular pentagon and an equilateral triangle inscribed in a circle with ruler and compasses (equivalent to taking square roots) - that gets you angles of $72 ^\circ$ and $60^\circ$ - you can get sin and cos of both angles, so can get sin and cos of the difference $12^\circ$. You can halve that twice to get down to $3^\circ$, and then you need to solve a cubic, which is solvable by radicals.

share|cite|improve this answer

Here's a table of exact values of the sine, cosine, tangent, and cotangent of integer multiples of $3^\circ$:

share|cite|improve this answer

This page has closed formulas for $\sin(n^\circ)$ for all $n=1,\dots,90$. Many of them involved $\sqrt{-1}$, not sure if that is avoidable but somebody in another answer on this page says it is not.

I would like to give credit to the person who made me aware of that list, but their post was deleted so I can't recover who it was. But thank you, whoever you are.

share|cite|improve this answer

Using the formula $$ \sin(\pi/n) = \frac 12 i e^{-\pi i/n}-\frac 12 i e^{\pi i/n} = \frac 12 (-1)^{1/2} (-1)^{(n-1)/n}-\frac 12 (-1)^{1/2} (-1)^{1/n}, $$ one can write $\sin(\pi/n)$ using radicals for any positive integer $n$.

share|cite|improve this answer
How do you evaluate $(-1)^{1/n}$ as $a+bi$, where $a$ and $b$ are real and are written using radicals? – Michael Hardy Nov 4 '12 at 2:01

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.