Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is the difference between ring $\mathbb{Z}_n$ and congruence to modulo $n$.

Are they same thing or what are significant differences between them except we can use integers greater than $n$ for modulo operations. They look like the same.

share|cite|improve this question
Congruence modulo $n$ is a relation, so it cannot be a ring. They are entirely different types of things; this alone should suffice as an answer. – Marc van Leeuwen Nov 2 '12 at 13:58
@Marc That's not true generally - see my comment to your answer. – Bill Dubuque Nov 2 '12 at 14:25
@BillDubuque: just for clarity: by "That" you apparently mean "Congruence is a relation". You claim congruence can be defined as a subalgebra (of $\Bbb Z\times\Bbb Z$ in this case). That's fine with me, although it's not likely that OP considers it this way. And even then, this subalgebra is rather different from $\Bbb Z_n$. – Marc van Leeuwen Nov 2 '12 at 14:57
@Marc You stated that "a congruence cannot be a ring". That is false. In fact that a ring congruence is a ring is an essential property of a congruence. One cannot argue such semantic points so simply. – Bill Dubuque Nov 2 '12 at 15:07
@BillDubuque: As I said, it's fine with me; have a nice day. But I actually meant to say a relation cannot be a ring; maybe that is not even quite true set-theoretically, but I don't care. – Marc van Leeuwen Nov 2 '12 at 15:15

First, review the definition of what a ring is.

In particular, it's a type of algebraic structure with two different binary operations defined on it (sometimes referred to as "addition" and "multiplication").

Next, review the definition of the ring $\mathbb{Z}_n$ and you will see that the two binary operations on it are just addition mod $n$ and multiplication mod $n$.

These are interrelated concepts, but the former is a type of algebraic structure with operations, and the latter ($+$ mod $n$ and $\times$ mod $n$) are examples of operations; so they are certainly not one and the same.

share|cite|improve this answer

To elaborate on my comment, something positive can be said about the relation between the congrence modulo $n$ and the ring $\Bbb Z/n\Bbb Z$: the latter is the quotient of the the ring $\Bbb n$ by the relation of congrence modulo $n$.

This means the elements of $\Bbb Z/n\Bbb Z$ are classes of the relation of congrence modulo $n$ (which is an equivalence relation; any equivalence relation gives a partition of the set it is defined on into equivalence classes). Moreover the operations of addition and multiplication in $\Bbb Z/n\Bbb Z$ are derived from those operations in $\Bbb Z$: to perform one of these operations, one chooses elements (representatives) from the classes to be added/multiplied, one performs the corresponding operation upon them in $\Bbb Z$, and finally one takes the class (modulo $n$) of the resulting number.

It is a non-trivial fact, which can be proved, that every set of choices of representatives will give the same end result (a class modulo $n$); this is why the quotient ring of $\Bbb Z$ by the relation of equivalence modulo $n$ is defined in the first place. (And it explains why there is no such thing as a quotient ring $\Bbb R/n\Bbb R$; in this case the required property for defining multiplication fails.)

share|cite|improve this answer
Generally it is not true that congruences are defined to be merely a set-theoretic object such as an equivalence relation. That fails to capture the algebraic essence of a congruence. Instead, congruences are more naturally defined algebraically: a congruence of a general algebraic structure $\,\rm A\,$ is a certain sub-algebra of $\rm\,A^2$ (containing the diagonal $\rm\,A(1,1),\:$ etc). For example, see my answer here, which discusses in detail ring congruences on $\,\Bbb Z\,$ from this viewpoint. – Bill Dubuque Nov 2 '12 at 14:26
@BillDubuque: Doubtless you are right (although I think what you say is essentially the same as saying an equivalence relation that is also compatible with the algebraic operations so that these can be transferred to the quotient; this is just what I said, differently), but I doubt whether OP has the mathematical maturity to understand your answer. Or indeed mine. – Marc van Leeuwen Nov 2 '12 at 14:54

They are of one, but they are different kinds of mathematical objects.

Congruence modulo $n$ is an equivalence relation on $\Bbb Z$, whereas $\Bbb Z_n$ is a ring, namely the quotient ring by the congruence modulo $n$ relation (meaning that two elements of $\Bbb Z$ are regarded identical in $\Bbb Z_n$ iff they are congruent mod $n$).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.