Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This is what I have so far:

Assume $S^n$ is homeomorphic to $S^m$. Also, assume $m≠n$. So, let $m>n$.

From here I am not sure what is implied. Of course in this problem $S^k$ is defined as:

$S^k=\lbrace (x_0,x_1,⋯,x_{k+1}):x_0^2+x_1^2+⋯+x_{k+1}^2=1 \rbrace$ with subspace topology.

share|cite|improve this question
Can you prove that $\mathbb R^m$ and $\mathbb R^n$ are not homeomorphic when $m\neq n$? Because it follows directly from there when you note that $S^n\setminus \{x\} \cong \mathbb R^n$ (and $x$ is any point of $S^n$) – Thomas Andrews Nov 1 '12 at 16:46
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Hint: look at the topic Invariance of Domain

share|cite|improve this answer
I'm sorry, could you elaborate a bit more on your argument? I can't seem to work it out on my own. – Rudy the Reindeer Nov 1 '12 at 16:59
@MattN. It's the same argument as given in the comments. $S^n \setminus \{x\} \cong \mathbb R^n$ so $S^n \cong S^m$ implies $\mathbb R^n \cong \mathbb R^m$, which gives $n=m$ by invariance of domain. – JSchlather Nov 1 '12 at 18:53
@JacobSchlather, thank you for your comment! – Rudy the Reindeer Nov 1 '12 at 19:11
@JacobSchlather Thank you – Un Chien Andalou Nov 2 '12 at 5:12
@MattN. Hope you have got it – Un Chien Andalou Nov 2 '12 at 5:12

A non-elementary argument would be that spaces with non-identical homotopy groups are not homeomorphic.

Assume $n < m$. Then $\pi_n (S^n) = \mathbb Z$ (see this article) but $\pi_n(S^m) = 0$. Hence $S^n$ and $S^m$ are not homeomorphic if $n \neq m$.

Alternatively, as pointed out in the comments, you could use homology groups: $H_n(S^n) = \mathbb Z$ but $H_n(S^m) = 0$. But homeomorphic spaces have isomorphic homology groups.

share|cite|improve this answer
This result uses the homology groups of spheres, so wouldn't it be easier to make the same conclusion using homology? – Espen Nielsen Nov 1 '12 at 17:03
@espen180 Yes, one could of course also argue using homology groups. I added it to my answer, thanks a lot for mentioning it! – Rudy the Reindeer Nov 1 '12 at 17:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.