Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm sure I'm having a notational misunderstanding. Anyway, suppose $(f_n)$ is a sequence of continuous functions from a metric space $X$ to $\mathbb{R}$. So, if $(f_n)$ converges uniformly to a function $f$, then

$$\lim_{n \to \infty} \inf_{x \in X} f_n(x) = \inf_{x \in X} \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x)$$


$$\lim_{n \to \infty} \sup_{x \in X} f_n(x) = \sup_{x \in X} \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x).$$

Can somebody explain to me why is that? Again, this might be really simple...

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

I think to talk about $\sup$ and $\inf$ you need some sort of order on $Y$? Anyways, I'm going to take $Y = \mathbb{R}$ in what follows.

We have $f$ is the uniform limit of the $f_i$, and the claim is $$\lim_i \sup_{x \in X} f_i(x) = \sup_{x \in X} f(x)$$I treat the case $\sup_{x \in X} f(x) = M < \infty$, for $M = \infty$ you can minimally alter the same argument. Lemme know if you want details.

First of all, why does $\lim_i \sup_{x \in X} f_i(x)$ exist? Well indeed, let's show this sequence is Cauchy. Fix $\epsilon > 0$, for $i$ large enough we have all the $f_i$ uniformly within $\epsilon$ of $f$. For $j, j' > i$ take a sequence $x_n$ such that $f_j(x_n)$ converges to $\sup_{x} f_j(x)$, we have $$\sup_x f_{j'}(x) \geqslant \limsup_n f_{j'}(x_n) \geqslant \lim f_j(x_n) - \epsilon = \sup_x f_j(x) - \epsilon$$by symmetry we have the result.

Now onto business, we want to show $$\lim_j \sup_x f_j(x) = M$$

Well let's see $\geqslant$: for any $\epsilon > 0$, we can find $x$ such that $f(x)$ is within $\epsilon$ of $M$, and for big enough $n$ we have $f_n(x)$ is within $\epsilon$ of $f(x)$. In particular $\sup_{x' \in X} f_i(x ') \geqslant f_i(x) \geqslant M - 2\epsilon$

So we get $$\lim_i \sup_{x \in X} f_i(x) \geqslant M$$

Now let's see $\leqslant$: it suffices to show $\leqslant M + \epsilon$, for any $\epsilon > 0$. Indeed, for $i >> 0$, we have $f_i(x)$ is uniformly within $f(x)$. For such large $i$, take a sequence $x_n$ such that $\lim_n f_i(x_n) = \sup_x f_i(x)$. We have $$\lim_n f_i(x_n) \leqslant \limsup_n f(x_n) + \epsilon \leqslant M + \epsilon$$as desired.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for your reply! As you pointed out, $Y$ should be $\mathbb{R}$. I'll edit it. On the other hand, I think that the second appearance of $j '$ in the inequality proving that $\lim_i \sup_{x \in X} f_i(x)$ is a Cauchy sequence should be $j$, right? – ragrigg Nov 1 '12 at 0:53
@ragrigg of course; glad to help! There was indeed an error in that line, I think I've fixed it, namely I want the second $j'$ to be an $n$, since we're examining the sequence $x_n$. lemme know if you buy it – uncookedfalcon Nov 1 '12 at 1:39

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.