Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I cannot find a proof for the following statement, though the statement itself seems common enough:

$X$ is an affine subspace of $\mathbb{R}^n \iff \forall a\in X: X - \{a\}$ is a linear subspace.

An affine subspace being a subset of a vector space, such that any affine combination $\sum_{i=1}^k \lambda_i x^i,\ \sum_{i=1}^k \lambda_i = 1$ of vectors from $X$ also belongs to $X$.

Could someone supply a proof?

share|cite|improve this question
What's your definition of affine subspace, is it a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ that's closed under affine combinations? – littleO Oct 31 '12 at 22:14
Usually $X-\{a\}$ is the set $X$ without the point $a$, and I assume you want the translate of $X$ by $-a$. This is sometimes denoted by $X-a$, but for clarity I would explain what you mean, i.e., that it is the set of all $x-a$ where $x\in X$. – Lukas Geyer Oct 31 '12 at 22:34
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Let $X$ be an affine subspace and $a \in X$. We will prove that $X - a$ is a linear subspace, so let $x,y \in X$ and $\lambda, \mu \in \mathbb R$. Then \[ \lambda(x-a) + \mu(y-a) = \lambda x + \mu y + (1 -\lambda - \mu)a - a \] Now $\lambda x +\mu y + (1-\lambda-\mu)a \in X$ as an affine combination of vectors from $X$, so \[ \lambda(x-a) + \mu(y-a) = \lambda x + \mu y + (1 -\lambda - \mu)a - a \in X - a \] and $X-a$ is closed under linear combinations, hence a linear subspace.

Now suppose that $X-a$ is a linear subspace for some $a \in X$, then for $x_i \in X$ and $\lambda_i \in \mathbb R$ with $\sum_i \lambda_i = 1$ we have \begin{align*} \sum_i \lambda_i x_i &= \sum_i\lambda_i (x_i - a) + \sum_i\lambda_i a\\ &= \sum_i \lambda_i (x_i - a) + a\\ &\in X - a + a\\ &= X. \end{align*} Hence, $X$ is affine.

Note, that in arguing, we always supposed $X \ne \emptyset$, if $X$ is the empty affine subspace, the right hand side is trivially true.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.